Trusted by 2,000+ brands and agencies across 25+ countries
Seven outreach situations, each with its own arrangement rather than one template with the words swapped. You type the specifics and it writes the whole email, with nothing left in curly brackets to find and replace.
| Field | What it does in the document | Where it came from |
|---|
A follow-up should not open the way a first contact does, and a message confirming what you agreed should not pitch at all. Each of the seven situations has its own opening, its own order and its own closing line. Switching the scenario rebuilds the email rather than swapping a greeting.
A template you copy from a page leaves you hunting for every token and missing one, which is how a creator receives a message addressed to a first name in brackets. Here the values go in before the email exists, so the thing you copy is finished text.
It runs in your browser tab and makes no request when you press the button. It also does not send the email. You copy the text into your own mail client, which is where your signature and your sending reputation already live.
Pick the situation, fill the boxes, press the button. The generator assembles a complete email with a subject line, prints it into an editable box and lists every field underneath so you can see what made it in. You copy the text into your own mail client and send it from there.
The subject line is built from what you typed too, usually your brand and their handle, so it is specific without being a trick. There is no attempt at a clever opener and no attempt to disguise what the message is. A creator can tell a pitch from a subject line either way, and the ones who open yours do it because the name and the specifics look real.
One box asks what you actually saw. It is the only part of the email a creator cannot have received from anyone else, so it is the part that decides whether the rest is read. Write a real sentence. Name the video, the recipe or the thread and say what about it stuck. If you leave it empty the generator says so in plain terms, because an outreach email that opens on your own brand is the weakest version of this message.
Fields are not all equal. Skipping the fee on a paid brief adds a visible note telling you not to leave a paid ask vague. Skipping the deliverables drops that block from the email entirely rather than leaving a heading over nothing. Skipping your role shortens the signature. The field table reports every one of these.
The draft lands in an editable box and you should edit it. Cut a sentence that does not sound like you, add the detail that is specific to this creator. The copy button takes the box as it stands, so your edits travel with it.
Opens on what you saw, then one sentence on who you are, then the idea and the ask. It is the shortest of the seven on purpose. The job of a first email is to get a reply, not to close the deal, so it carries the specifics and stops.
Leads with the reminder rather than the pitch, on the assumption the creator does not remember the first message and should not have to search for it. It restates who you are in one line, says this is the one nudge and leaves it there. A follow-up that repeats the whole original email reads like automation.
Says no obligation in the second line, before the offer, because that is the only thing distinguishing it from a pitch. It separates the gift from any future paid conversation explicitly, which is both fairer and more likely to work.
Puts the whole offer in the first screen. The idea, the deliverables, the fee if you entered one, the timing and the usage. A paid ask that hides the scope behind a call request wastes a round, and a creator deciding whether to reply wants to know what is being asked.
Drops the introduction, because the conversation has already started, and opens by thanking them for the figures. It states what you are trying to fit and leaves the next move with them. It does not haggle for you, and it suggests no counter figure.
Has no pitch and no ask. It restates the deliverables, the fee, the timing and the usage as a record, then asks for a one-word confirmation and says the brief and the agreement follow. It is the email that prevents the argument at draft stage.
Frames the arrangement as ongoing rather than a single post, because that is a different proposition and should not be smuggled in as one. It explains the shape before the terms.
An excellent email to a creator whose audience is not your customer still fails. Search by niche, audience and engagement first.
Follower authenticity and audience location on every profile, so your shortlist is worth writing to.
Verified contact details sit on the profile, so you are not hunting for an address.
The generator needs no account at all. The database has a free tier.
Every name and figure below is invented to show how the output changes with the scenario. None of it is a reference point and no fee here is a suggestion.
A subject line reading Northside Coffee Co x @maya.brews. A greeting to Maya, then the line saying this is a paid brief rather than a gifting ask, then her grinder video in Priya's own words, then one sentence on Northside. Then the idea, the two deliverables as bullets, the timing and the usage. Because the fee box was left empty the email carries a bracketed note telling Priya not to leave a paid ask vague. It closes on the call request and the signature.
Switch the situation to a follow-up and the email rebuilds. The subject becomes Following up: Northside Coffee Co, the opening becomes the one-nudge line, the brand reminder moves above the grinder reference and the bracketed fee note disappears because a follow-up is not where a fee belongs. Nothing was swapped. A different email was assembled from the same boxes.
A creator can tell the difference between a message about their work and a message about creators in their category. The first sentence is where that shows. Naming the specific piece and what about it you noticed is the whole of it, and no amount of polish elsewhere substitutes.
Writing to ask whether someone might be interested in exploring a possible collaboration puts the work of deciding what you want onto them. Say what you want made, when and on what terms. A creator can say no to a clear ask quickly, which is better for both of you than a vague one that sits unanswered.
Asking for a reply, a rate card, their availability and a call in the same email gets you none of them. The generator has a single ask field and puts one closing line in the email for that reason. Pick the next step you actually need.
If you want the reasoning at more length, or a set of templates to read rather than a tool to fill, the creator outreach toolkit has four written out with a short playbook, and seven influencer marketing email templates covers more scenarios in prose. This page is the version that fills them in for you.
Save 50% on annual billing across paid plans.
Two mechanical things decide whether the email you just wrote gets opened and finished. Neither is a trick and neither needs a figure attached to it.
Your brand and their handle, in most of the seven situations, because that is the most honest description of what the email is. A follow-up says it is a follow-up. A confirmation says it is confirming. None of them tries to look like a reply to something, a question or an internal message, which are the three tricks that get an open and lose the creator on the first line.
A creator who opens a disguised subject arrives annoyed, which is a worse starting position than not being opened. The specificity of your brand name and their handle does the work: it says a person wrote this to them, and the first line of the body then has to prove it. If the subject feels dull, the problem is usually that the email behind it is not specific enough yet.
The draft shows a word count under the headline. It is a count of your own text and not a target, because there is no correct length and nothing here claims one. What the count is useful for is noticing drift. If you filled every optional box on a cold first contact, the email got long, and a first contact is the one situation where shorter almost always reads better. Cut the usage line and the timing line out of a first email and keep them for the reply.
A paid collaboration brief can be long, because a creator deciding whether to reply wants the scope. A confirmation can be long, because its job is to be complete. A first contact cannot, because nothing in it has earned the reader yet. That is why the seven arrangements differ in how much they put in front of you rather than all offering the same slots.
You have ten creators and no idea how to open. Doing the first one here shows you the shape, and the what-you-saw box forces the part that cannot be reused. Generate ten emails with ten different first paragraphs rather than one email sent ten times.
The follow-up is the message most people get wrong, usually by apologising or by resending the original. The follow-up arrangement here does neither. It reminds, restates once and stops.
The confirming scenario exists because the most expensive misunderstandings happen between agreeing and drafting. Generating a short record of the deliverables, fee, timing and usage takes a minute and removes the version where everyone remembers it differently.
It works in that direction too. Put your own name in the brand field and what you make in the one-line box, name what you noticed about the brand and set the ask to whichever next step you want. The structure does not care which side is writing.
"We tested three platforms before landing on Flinque. The creator data is more reliable. The filters actually work. Our team spends half the time finding the right influencers now."
"Flinque replaced two tools we were paying for separately. Creator discovery and performance tracking in one place. And the data is actually accurate."
"Our campaign turnaround time dropped significantly after switching to Flinque. What used to take a full day of research now takes under an hour."
It does not send anything. There is no mail integration, no tracking and no list. You copy the text into your own client and send from your own address.
It does not find creators or contact details. That is a different job and this page does not pretend to do it.
It does not suggest a fee. The fee line appears only when you type one, and on a paid ask left empty the email tells you to fix that rather than offering a figure.
It does not tell you what reply rate to expect. No figure on this page claims anything about how outreach performs.
It does not personalise for you. The one box that makes an email personal is the one box you have to write yourself, and leaving it empty is reported rather than patched over.
It does not store anything. Nothing is saved and nothing is sent, so copy the draft out before closing the tab.
The best email to a mismatched audience still fails. Search verified creators by niche, engagement and audience quality, free to start.
A complete email with a subject line, a greeting, an opening in your own words, one line on your brand, the offer, the deliverables, any fee and timing and usage you entered, a single closing ask and your signature. It lands in an editable box on the page, and a copy button puts the current contents on your clipboard so you can paste it into your own mail client. Nothing is sent from here and there is no tracking of any kind.
A template leaves tokens for you to find and replace, and the usual failure is missing one, which is how creators end up receiving messages addressed to a name in curly brackets. Here the values are substituted before the draft exists, so what you copy is finished. The bigger difference is that the seven situations are seven different arrangements rather than one body with a swapped line. Changing from a first contact to a follow-up moves the brand reminder above the compliment, changes the opening and the subject and drops blocks that do not belong in a follow-up.
Seven. A cold first contact, a follow up after no reply, a gifting offer with no post required, a paid collaboration brief, a reply to a creator who has sent you their rates, a confirmation of what you agreed and an ambassador or affiliate invite. Each has its own opening, its own order and its own closing line. The confirmation one has no pitch and no ask at all, because its job is to be a record rather than a message that persuades.
No. The fee line appears in the email only if you type a figure into the fee box. If you leave it empty on a paid ask, the draft carries a bracketed note telling you not to leave a paid ask vague, and that note is for you to delete once you have fixed it. The generator does not offer a range, a starting figure or anything about what a creator of any size costs, and no number on this page claims anything of the kind. The only figure it works out is the word count of your own draft.
No, and that is the one thing it deliberately refuses. The box asking what you actually saw is the only part of the message a creator could not have received from anybody else, and it is the part that decides whether the rest gets read. Writing it is yours. If you leave it empty the generator tells you that the email now opens on your own brand, which is the weakest version of the message, rather than quietly filling it with a generic compliment.
Yes. Put your own name in the brand field, what you make in the one-line box and write what you noticed about the brand in the what-you-saw box. Set the ask to the next step you want, which for a creator is often a reply with their process or a call. The structure does not assume which side is writing, and the confirming scenario is just as useful to a creator who wants the terms written down before starting work.
10M+ verified creators across 4 platforms, 12 filters and a fake-follower score on every profile. No card.