New Flinque AI now scores creator authenticity in real time across 4 platforms. See how

The Shelf vs IMA: What Happened to IMA

Platform comparison

The Shelf vs IMA

One runs full-funnel influencer performance out of Atlanta. The other runs global campaigns from Amsterdam inside a listed holding group. Here is how The Shelf and IMA differ on scale and on evidence.

✍︎ Flinque Research Team 📅 Published August 12, 2026 🔄 Updated August 12, 2026 ⏱ 8 min read
4
Clients The Shelf names on its own site
2
Group layers above IMA, Media.Monks and S4 Capital
10M+
Verified creators on Flinque, the alternative below
$0
Flinque Free Plan, with no card and no demo

Introduction

The Shelf and IMA are not a like-for-like choice, because only one of them is trading. IMA is a brand that no longer trades. MediaMonks, part of S4 Capital, merged with it in August 2019. The evidence is straightforward: the agency's own domain forwards to Monks and no IMA-branded page survives anywhere on it. The rest of this page sets out the position on IMA and on The Shelf.

Free toolkit · 28 pages

The Creator Outreach Toolkit

12 email templates that get replies, a 50-point creator vetting checklist, rate negotiation scripts and a campaign tracker. Built from 4 years of running creator campaigns.

You are all set. Finish signing up now →
Something went wrong. Open the toolkit directly →

The Shelf vs IMA at a glance

The quick read on an independent performance agency against a group-owned global one, with Flinque shown for contrast.

FeatureThe ShelfIMAFlinque
ModelPerformance agencyFull-service agencySelf-serve software
HeadquartersAmsterdam, until the 2019 mergerAmsterdam, NetherlandsRemote, serving 25+ countries
OwnershipIndependentMedia.Monks, part of S4 CapitalIndependent
Stated approachFull-funnel influencer marketingGlobal influencer campaignsDiscovery and vetting
Reported clientsHeineken, Diesel and Booking.com, named 2019Diesel and Beiersdorf, named 2019Self-serve, no client gate
Evidence qualityOwn-site clients only, verifiedNamed on public recordPublished pricing
PricingNone, nor any at MonksQuote per campaignFree $0, Starter $49/mo, Enterprise $150/mo

What The Shelf is

The Shelf is a performance agency in Atlanta working on what it calls full-funnel influencer marketing. The phrase is worth unpacking. Most influencer work is bought and measured at the top of the funnel on reach and engagement. A full-funnel framing commits the agency to tracking further down toward consideration and purchase, which is harder to do and harder to hide behind.

Reported clients on its own site include Nordstrom, Savers Value Village, ROAR Organic and Peelz Citrus. That is a retail and beverage mix at mid-market scale rather than a list of global giants. One point deserves stating openly: Neutrogena appears in third-party directories but not on the agency's own site, so it has been left out here, while Hulu does sit on The Shelf's own homepage logo bar. That is the kind of gap worth raising directly rather than assuming, because directory listings are frequently stale or aspirational.

What IMA was

Retired brandMerged 2019Now MonksAmsterdam, historically

MediaMonks, part of S4 Capital, merged with it in August 2019. A reader arriving on this name should know IMA is not something a brand can contract with. The evidence is straightforward: the old domain now lands on Monks, while monks.com/ima is a 404.

Pricing was looked for on the Monks influencer solution page and was not found there. Founded in Amsterdam in 2010 by Emilie Tabor and Maddie Raedts, it gained Anneke Schogt as chief executive six years later. The only sourced scale figures are S4 Capital's: 40,000 influencers in network and 85 digital experts.

Monks is where the work went. Anything attached to this name beyond the 2019 announcement comes from directories rather than the company.

What IMA was known for

  • Amsterdam base until the 2019 merger
  • Fashion and beauty campaign work
  • Founded 2010 by Emilie Tabor and Maddie Raedts
  • Full-service influencer campaigns out of Amsterdam

Why it is not a live option

  • Nothing first-party survives at the old domain
  • Every figure on record is dated 2019
  • The brand no longer exists to hire
  • monks.com/ima returns a 404

Head to head

This pairing needs a caveat before the detail. The merger with S4 Capital's MediaMonks was announced in August 2019. IMA is a closed chapter now. The evidence is straightforward: following imagency.com lands on Monks and the Monks page carries no IMA reference at all. That makes The Shelf the only side of this pairing a brand can actually engage, so the useful question is not which is better but what happened to IMA and where the work went.

Where each one leaves a gap

Where The Shelf leaves a gap

  • The verified client list is short at four names on the agency's own site. Two further names circulate in directories without first-party confirmation.
  • Full-funnel measurement requires your own tracking to be in order. Without it the agency cannot prove the part that distinguishes it.
  • No published pricing. Cost cannot be judged before a scoping conversation.

Where IMA leaves a gap

  • Two layers of group ownership above the agency add process. A smaller brand should ask what the minimum viable engagement is.
  • The global positioning is built for multi-market work. A single-market campaign may not need what you are paying for.
  • Pricing is quote-based, so comparison against another agency requires both to scope the same brief first.

Where Flinque fits

Flinque is software rather than an agency and does not compete with either on delivery. It covers discovery and vetting, indexing 10M+ verified creators across 4 platforms with 200 data points per creator reported on each profile, which lets you check audience location and authenticity independently.

For a full-funnel brief that check is not cosmetic. Conversion depends on whether a creator's audience actually matches your buyer. Reach figures say nothing about that. Running the filter yourself before either agency proposes a roster means you can ask why a specific creator is on the list rather than accepting it. Flinque is self-serve with no demo and no annual lock-in. The Free Plan is $0, Starter is $49 a month and Enterprise is $150 a month, so the check costs less than the time spent preparing a brief.

Final thoughts

The takeaway

Reaching YouTube creators by email works best when you combine methodical research, ethical sourcing and respectful communication. Focus on publicly shared, business-oriented YouTube channel contact points and clear, value-driven proposals.

Over time, thoughtful YouTube influencer email outreach can build reliable, mutually beneficial relationships with channels across many niches. The brands that win long-term creator partnerships are those that treat outreach as relationship-building. Not just a numbers game.

Next step

There is nothing current to compare on this point, since IMA is not a going concern. IMA stopped being a hireable brand in 2019, when MediaMonks merged with it. If that is what you wanted, Monks is where to go. For work you need delivered, The Shelf is the side still trading.

Find and vet these creators yourself, free

10M+ verified creators across 4 platforms, 12 filters and a fake-follower score on every profile. No card.

FAQs

Common questions about The Shelf vs IMA

Quick answers to the questions brands and marketers ask most often.

What is the difference between The Shelf and IMA?

The important difference is status. The Shelf is a live business you can brief. IMA is not an agency you can hire, which the proof sits on the companies' own pages following imagency.com lands on Monks and the Monks page carries no IMA reference at all makes plain. It merged into MediaMonks in August 2019.

What does full-funnel actually mean here?

It means the agency commits to measuring past reach and engagement into consideration and purchase. That is a harder standard than most influencer work is held to. It also depends on your own tracking being sound, because an agency cannot demonstrate downstream impact if the attribution is not in place on your side.

Why is Neutrogena not listed for The Shelf?

Neutrogena appears in third-party directories but not on the agency's own site, so it is excluded here rather than repeated. Hulu, by contrast, sits on The Shelf's own homepage logo bar. Directory listings are often stale, so if a brand matters to your assessment, ask the agency directly and request evidence.

Does IMA's ownership matter?

What a searcher needs to know first is that IMA cannot be hired. The evidence is straightforward: imagency.com redirects to the Monks influencer marketing page and monks.com/ima returns a 404. MediaMonks, part of S4 Capital, merged with it in August 2019.

Which suits a multi-market campaign?

The Shelf. That is settled by status rather than by fit. The IMA name was retired after the 2019 MediaMonks merger. Monks carries the work now. If you specifically wanted IMA, approach Monks.

Where does Flinque fit alongside them?

Flinque handles discovery and vetting, which neither agency offers as a searchable capability. It indexes 10M+ verified creators across 4 platforms with 200 data points per creator reported. The Free Plan is $0 with no card and no demo, so you can check audience fit yourself before an agency proposes its own roster.

Written & reviewed by Flinque Research Team

Influencer Marketing Research · View team →

Our research team specialises in influencer marketing strategy, creator analytics and outreach best practices. All content is reviewed for accuracy using live platform data and current industry standards.

📧 Creator outreach 📺 YouTube strategy 🔍 Contact research 🗓 Updated January 28 2026

Disclaimer: All information on this page is collected from publicly available sources, third-party search engines, AI-powered tools and general online research. We do not claim ownership of any external data and accuracy may vary. This content is for informational purposes only.