★ Final days · ends July 31 15% off the Starter plan, forever. Use code FLINQUE15 COPY
New Flinque AI now scores creator authenticity in real time across 4 platforms. See how

inBeat vs Goldfish

Agency comparison

inBeat vs Goldfish: Two Managed Agencies Compared

One runs micro-influencer and UGC campaigns from Montreal. The other runs influencer marketing across Latin America from Bogota. Here is how they compare, plus the self-serve alternative.

✍︎ Flinque Research Team 📅 Published December 19, 2025 🔄 Updated January 28, 2026 8 min read
10M+
Verified creators on Flinque, the alternative below
$0
Flinque Free Plan, against a quote-only rival
4
Platforms on Flinque, with transparent pricing
200+
Data points per creator on Flinque

Introduction

inBeat and Goldfish are both managed influencer agencies, so this comparison is about focus and region rather than software you log into. inBeat is a performance agency in Montreal, with a reported second base in Los Angeles, built around micro-influencers, UGC and paid social. Goldfish is an influencer agency reported out of Bogota, Colombia that runs campaigns across Latin America. Both deliver campaigns for you rather than hand you a tool.

A quick note on identity. Goldfish is an ambiguous name that also attaches to a London digital agency, so the entity here is the Bogota-based influencer shop and is worth confirming. Neither agency publishes a creator database size or a rate card, since both sell done-for-you services. Every figure here is reported and worth checking directly. At the end we cover where Flinque fits as the self-serve software alternative to both.

Free toolkit · 28 pages

The Creator Outreach Toolkit

12 email templates that get replies, a 50-point creator vetting checklist, rate negotiation scripts and a campaign tracker. Built from 4 years of running creator campaigns.

You are all set. Finish signing up now →
Something went wrong. Open the toolkit directly →

inBeat vs Goldfish at a glance

Two managed agencies side by side, with the self-serve alternative in the third column.

FeatureinBeatGoldfishFlinque
ModelManaged agency, done for youManaged agency, done for youSelf-serve software, no demo
TypePerformance, micro-influencer and UGCInfluencer-only, LatAm focusSelf-serve discovery and vetting
HQMontreal, Canada (also LA)Bogota, ColombiaReported 25+ countries covered
FocusMicro-influencer, UGC and paid socialInfluencer marketing across Latin AmericaCreator discovery and vetting
Notable clientsNordstrom, New Balance, 7-ElevenP&G, Samsung, Coca-Cola, UberUsed by teams of all sizes
Database and pricingNot publicly disclosedNot publicly disclosedReported 10M+ creators, flat Free to $150/mo
Best forBrands wanting micro-influencer UGC and paid socialBrands wanting Latin American reachTeams wanting verified creators and a visible price

Client names are as publicly stated and Goldfish is a generic-name match, so confirm both directly.

What inBeat is

inBeat is a performance-focused influencer agency reported to run out of Montreal, with a further presence in Los Angeles. It works mainly in micro-influencers, user-generated content and paid social, pairing creator content with performance media rather than one-off brand posts. Its publicly stated clients include Nordstrom, New Balance and 7-Eleven, established names that suit its content-and-performance model.

Public detail does not go much further. inBeat does not disclose a creator database size or any pricing, so you scope the work directly and pay agency fees rather than a subscription. The micro-influencer and UGC approach fits brands that need authentic content at volume for paid channels. It is not built for a team that wants to search and vet creators for itself.

i
inBeat in one line

A performance agency reported out of Montreal focused on micro-influencers, UGC and paid social.

What Goldfish is

Goldfish is an influencer marketing agency reported to be based in Bogota, Colombia, with a focus on campaigns across Latin America. Its publicly stated clients include Procter and Gamble, Samsung, Coca-Cola and Uber, a roster of large multinationals investing in the region. As a managed agency it takes on strategy, creator selection and delivery so your own team does not run any software.

One caveat matters up front. Goldfish is a generic name that also maps to a London digital agency, so the entity here is the Bogota influencer shop and should be confirmed. Beyond its client list the agency publishes little, with no creator database size, feature set or pricing in public. It fits a brand that wants Latin American influencer reach delivered for it, though the specifics arrive only in a sales conversation.

i
Goldfish in one line

An influencer agency reported out of Bogota running campaigns across Latin America.

Head to head

The choice here is about region and content model. inBeat is the pick when you want micro-influencer content and paid social run from a North American base. Goldfish is the stronger option when your priority is influencer reach across Latin America from a partner that works those markets. Both are managed services though, so neither hands your team software to run discovery and vetting without an agency in the loop. Confirm Goldfish's identity too, given the shared name.

Where each one leaves a gap

The trade-offs are clear.

  • inBeat keeps its numbers private, so there is no public database size, feature list or pricing to weigh before a conversation. You are judging it on its client list and its UGC pitch, not a spec sheet.
  • Its focus on micro-influencers and paid social means a brand after large-scale reach or celebrity creators may find it narrow. The angle that makes it effective also limits it.
  • As a managed service it means fees and a scoping process rather than a login, so a team that wants to operate discovery itself gets a service instead of software.
  • Goldfish shares its name with at least one unrelated agency, so simply confirming you have the right company takes effort before any campaign talk. That ambiguity is a real friction point.
  • Beyond a client list it publishes very little, with no database size, feature set or pricing to compare. The detail only surfaces once you are in a pitch.
  • Goldfish runs campaigns for you, so it does not give an in-house team a tool to find and vet creators directly. Teams wanting that control need software rather than an agency.

Where Flinque fits

Flinque is the self-serve software alternative to both. Instead of hiring a team to run campaigns, you search and vet creators yourself in a platform with a reported 10 million-plus verified creators across Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and X, spanning a reported 25-plus countries. Every profile carries a reported 200 data points and a fake-follower check, with 12 filters across creator and audience data.

If you want a partner to own delivery, inBeat and Goldfish are both managed options depending on whether you lead with UGC and paid social or Latin American reach. But if you would rather find verified creators yourself on four platforms with a price you can see and no demo or annual lock-in, that is what Flinque offers at a flat Free of $0, Starter at $49 a month or Enterprise at $150 a month.

Final thoughts

The takeaway

Reaching YouTube creators by email works best when you combine methodical research, ethical sourcing and respectful communication. Focus on publicly shared, business-oriented YouTube channel contact points and clear, value-driven proposals.

Over time, thoughtful YouTube influencer email outreach can build reliable, mutually beneficial relationships with channels across many niches. The brands that win long-term creator partnerships are those that treat outreach as relationship-building. Not just a numbers game.

Next step

Skip the 20-step manual lookup for every creator. and pull 50 verified creator emails in under a minute.

Find and vet these creators yourself, free

10M+ verified creators across 4 platforms, 12 filters and a fake-follower score on every profile. No card.

FAQs

Common questions about inBeat vs Goldfish

Quick answers to the questions brands and marketers ask most often.

What is the difference between inBeat and Goldfish?

Both are managed influencer agencies, so the difference is focus and region. inBeat is a performance agency reported out of Montreal, built around micro-influencers, UGC and paid social, with clients like Nordstrom and New Balance. Goldfish is an influencer agency reported out of Bogota that runs campaigns across Latin America, with clients like Coca-Cola and Samsung. Neither is self-serve software. You hire either one to run campaigns for you.

Do inBeat or Goldfish publish pricing?

No. Like most managed agencies, neither publishes a public rate card or a creator database size. Pricing is set through a scoping conversation based on the program you want. That means you cannot compare them on numbers before you talk, so you judge them on focus, past clients and regional fit. If a visible price matters to you, a self-serve platform is the more transparent route to take.

Which agency is better for Latin America?

Goldfish, on its own positioning. It is reported to be based in Bogota and runs influencer campaigns across Latin America, with multinational clients like Procter and Gamble and Coca-Cola. inBeat is North American and built around micro-influencer UGC, so it is not centered on LatAm the same way. If your audience sits in Latin America, Goldfish has the more relevant story, though you should confirm you have the right Goldfish given the shared name.

Is Goldfish the same as the London agency with that name?

Not necessarily. Goldfish is a generic name that maps to more than one company, including a London digital agency, so the entity in this comparison is the Bogota-based influencer shop reported to work across Latin America. Before you reach out it is worth confirming you have the right firm, since a shared name can easily send a brief to the wrong inbox. Check the location and the client list to be sure.

Are inBeat and Goldfish self-serve tools?

No, both are managed-service agencies. You hire a team that plans and runs the campaign for you rather than logging into software to do it yourself. That is the right model if you want delivery handled and do not want to operate a platform. If you would rather search, vet and message creators directly, you want self-serve software instead, which is a different category from either agency.

What is a good alternative to inBeat and Goldfish?

Flinque is the self-serve alternative for teams that would rather run creator campaigns themselves than hire an agency. It covers a reported 10 million-plus verified creators across Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and X, with a reported 200 data points per creator, 12 filters and fake-follower detection on every profile. Pricing is flat and published at a Free Plan of $0 with no card, Starter at $49 a month and Enterprise at $150 a month. You can start vetting today with no demo or contract.

Written & reviewed by Flinque Research Team

Influencer Marketing Research · View team →

Our research team specialises in influencer marketing strategy, creator analytics and outreach best practices. All content is reviewed for accuracy using live platform data and current industry standards.

📧 Creator outreach 📺 YouTube strategy 🔍 Contact research 🗓 Updated January 28 2026

Disclaimer: All information on this page is collected from publicly available sources, third-party search engines, AI-powered tools and general online research. We do not claim ownership of any external data and accuracy may vary. This content is for informational purposes only.