★ Final days · ends July 31 15% off the Starter plan, forever. Use code FLINQUE15 COPY
New Flinque AI now scores creator authenticity in real time across 4 platforms. See how

House of Marketers vs inCast

Agency comparison

House of Marketers vs inCast: Two Managed Agencies Compared

One leans TikTok-first from London. The other runs full-service influencer programs across Latin America and the US. Here is how they compare, plus the self-serve alternative.

✍︎ Flinque Research Team 📅 Published December 19, 2025 🔄 Updated January 28, 2026 8 min read
10M+
Verified creators on Flinque, the alternative below
$0
Flinque Free Plan, against a quote-only rival
4
Platforms on Flinque, with transparent pricing
200+
Data points per creator on Flinque

Introduction

House of Marketers and inCast are both managed influencer marketing agencies, so comparing them is a question of focus and region rather than software you sign into. House of Marketers is a TikTok-led agency in London founded by early TikTok staff. inCast is a full-service agency reported to be based in Sao Paulo, Brazil, with work spanning Latin America and the United States. Both run campaigns for you rather than hand you a tool.

This page sets out what each agency does, where it sits and who it has worked with, using only publicly stated detail. Neither publishes a creator database size or a rate card, since both sell done-for-you services rather than self-serve access. Every figure here is reported and worth confirming directly. At the end we cover where Flinque fits as the self-serve software alternative to both.

Free toolkit · 28 pages

The Creator Outreach Toolkit

12 email templates that get replies, a 50-point creator vetting checklist, rate negotiation scripts and a campaign tracker. Built from 4 years of running creator campaigns.

You are all set. Finish signing up now →
Something went wrong. Open the toolkit directly →

House of Marketers vs inCast at a glance

Two managed agencies side by side, with the self-serve alternative in the third column.

FeatureHouse of MarketersinCastFlinque
ModelManaged agency, done for youManaged agency, done for youSelf-serve software, no demo
TypeFull-service, TikTok-ledFull-service, LatAm and USSelf-serve discovery and vetting
HQLondon, United KingdomSao Paulo, Brazil (some list LA)Reported 25+ countries covered
FocusTikTok influencer marketingInfluencer campaigns across LatAmCreator discovery and vetting
Notable clientsRimmel London, HelloFreshHeineken, BMW, Amazon, SamsungUsed by teams of all sizes
Database and pricingNot publicly disclosedNot publicly disclosedReported 10M+ creators, flat Free to $150/mo
Best forBrands wanting TikTok-first campaignsBrands wanting LatAm and US reachTeams wanting verified creators and a visible price

Client names are as publicly stated by each agency and figures are reported, so confirm directly.

What House of Marketers is

House of Marketers is a full-service influencer agency in London that leans hard into TikTok. It was founded by early TikTok staff, which is the root of its TikTok-first positioning and its pitch of insider platform knowledge. Its publicly stated clients include Rimmel London and HelloFresh, pointing at consumer brands that want short-form creator campaigns delivered end to end.

Like most agencies the public detail stops there. House of Marketers does not publish a creator database size or a rate card, so you engage it as a service and agree scope in a conversation. That suits a brand that wants hands-on TikTok expertise rather than a platform to operate. It is a weaker fit for a team that would rather run discovery and vetting itself across several networks.

i
House of Marketers in one line

A TikTok-led, full-service influencer agency in London founded by early TikTok staff.

What inCast is

inCast is a full-service influencer marketing agency reported to work out of Sao Paulo, Brazil, running campaigns across Latin America and into the United States. Its publicly stated clients include Heineken, BMW, Amazon and Samsung, a roster that skews toward large multinational brands rather than small teams testing the channel. As a managed agency it owns strategy, creator selection and delivery so nobody on your side operates any software.

Beyond that public detail is thin. inCast does not disclose a creator database size, a feature set or any pricing. Even its base is reported inconsistently since some directories list Los Angeles rather than Brazil. Read it as a done-for-you partner you brief rather than a product you log into. If a LatAm and US influencer push is the goal it has the regional story, though the specifics only surface in a sales call.

i
inCast in one line

A full-service influencer agency reported out of Sao Paulo running LatAm and US campaigns.

Head to head

The choice here is about region and channel, not tooling. House of Marketers is the sharper pick if TikTok is the whole plan and London is a workable base, since its team came out of TikTok itself. inCast is the stronger option if you need influencer reach across Latin America and the US from a partner that works in those markets daily. Both are done-for-you services though, so neither hands your team software to run campaigns without an agency in the loop.

Where each one leaves a gap

The trade-offs are clear.

  • House of Marketers keeps the usual agency details private, so there is no public database size, feature list or pricing to weigh before a call. You are buying a service on reputation rather than a spec sheet.
  • Its TikTok specialism is also its ceiling. A brand that needs strong reach on Instagram, YouTube or X may find it narrower than a full-service label suggests, so confirm scope before you commit.
  • As a managed service it means agency fees and a scoping process rather than a login. That is fine when you want delivery handled though limiting if your team wants to search and vet creators directly.
  • inCast publishes very little. Even its headquarters is reported inconsistently between Brazil and Los Angeles, so it is harder to know exactly what you are signing up for before a sales conversation.
  • There is no public creator database size or rate card, so you cannot compare it on numbers. The detail arrives only once you are already in a pitch.
  • inCast runs campaigns for you, so it does not give an in-house team a tool to find and vet creators on demand. Teams that want that control need software rather than an agency.

Where Flinque fits

Flinque is the self-serve software alternative to both. Instead of hiring a team to run campaigns, you search and vet creators yourself in a platform with a reported 10 million-plus verified creators across Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and X, spanning a reported 25-plus countries. Every profile carries a reported 200 data points and a fake-follower check, with 12 filters across creator and audience data.

If you want a partner to own delivery, House of Marketers and inCast are both credible managed choices depending on whether you lead with TikTok or LatAm reach. But if you would rather find verified creators yourself on four platforms with a price you can see and no demo or annual lock-in, that is what Flinque offers at a flat Free of $0, Starter at $49 a month or Enterprise at $150 a month.

Final thoughts

The takeaway

Reaching YouTube creators by email works best when you combine methodical research, ethical sourcing and respectful communication. Focus on publicly shared, business-oriented YouTube channel contact points and clear, value-driven proposals.

Over time, thoughtful YouTube influencer email outreach can build reliable, mutually beneficial relationships with channels across many niches. The brands that win long-term creator partnerships are those that treat outreach as relationship-building. Not just a numbers game.

Next step

Skip the 20-step manual lookup for every creator. and pull 50 verified creator emails in under a minute.

Find and vet these creators yourself, free

10M+ verified creators across 4 platforms, 12 filters and a fake-follower score on every profile. No card.

FAQs

Common questions about House of Marketers vs inCast

Quick answers to the questions brands and marketers ask most often.

What is the difference between House of Marketers and inCast?

Both are managed influencer marketing agencies, so the difference is focus and region. House of Marketers is a TikTok-led agency in London founded by early TikTok staff, with publicly stated clients like Rimmel London and HelloFresh. inCast is a full-service agency reported out of Sao Paulo that runs campaigns across Latin America and the US, with clients like Heineken and BMW. Neither is self-serve software. You hire either one to run campaigns for you.

Do House of Marketers or inCast publish pricing?

No. Like most managed agencies, neither publishes a public rate card or a creator database size. Pricing is set through a scoping conversation based on the program you want. That means you cannot line them up on numbers before you talk, so you judge them on focus, past clients and regional fit. If a visible price matters to you, a self-serve platform is the more transparent route to take.

Which agency is better for Latin America?

inCast, on its own positioning. It is reported to be based in Sao Paulo and runs influencer campaigns across Latin America and the United States, with multinational clients like Heineken and Samsung. House of Marketers is London-based and TikTok-led, so it is not built around LatAm the same way. If your audience sits in Latin America, inCast has the more relevant story, though you should confirm scope and its current base directly.

Where are these agencies based?

House of Marketers is based in London in the United Kingdom. inCast is reported to be based in Sao Paulo, Brazil, though some directories list Los Angeles instead, so its headquarters is worth confirming. Location matters for time zones, market knowledge and the regions each agency knows best. Both work with brands beyond their home markets, so treat HQ as a signal rather than a hard limit on where they operate.

Are House of Marketers and inCast self-serve tools?

No, both are managed-service agencies. You hire a team that plans and runs the campaign for you rather than logging into software to do it yourself. That is the right model if you want delivery handled and do not want to operate a platform. If you would rather search, vet and message creators directly, you want self-serve software instead, which is a different category from either agency.

What is a good alternative to House of Marketers and inCast?

Flinque is the self-serve alternative for teams that would rather run creator campaigns themselves than hire an agency. It covers a reported 10 million-plus verified creators across Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and X, with a reported 200 data points per creator, 12 filters and fake-follower detection on every profile. Pricing is flat and published at a Free Plan of $0 with no card, Starter at $49 a month and Enterprise at $150 a month. You can start vetting today with no demo or contract.

Written & reviewed by Flinque Research Team

Influencer Marketing Research · View team →

Our research team specialises in influencer marketing strategy, creator analytics and outreach best practices. All content is reviewed for accuracy using live platform data and current industry standards.

📧 Creator outreach 📺 YouTube strategy 🔍 Contact research 🗓 Updated January 28 2026

Disclaimer: All information on this page is collected from publicly available sources, third-party search engines, AI-powered tools and general online research. We do not claim ownership of any external data and accuracy may vary. This content is for informational purposes only.