★ Final days · ends July 31 15% off the Starter plan, forever. Use code FLINQUE15 COPY
New Flinque AI now scores creator authenticity in real time across 4 platforms. See how

ARCH. vs Clicks Talent

Platform comparison

ARCH. vs Clicks Talent

One sells measurable installs for games and apps. The other represents the creators themselves. Here is how ARCH. and Clicks Talent actually differ and what a brand should ask before signing either.

✍︎ Flinque Research Team 📅 Published August 12, 2026 🔄 Updated August 12, 2026 8 min read
4,000+
Influencers reported across the ARCH. roster
2
Very different business models on the table
10M+
Verified creators on Flinque, the alternative below
$0
Flinque Free Plan, with no card and no demo

Introduction

ARCH. and Clicks Talent both call themselves influencer agencies and that is roughly where the similarity stops. ARCH. is a performance shop in Zagreb that sells games and apps on installs and return, working through a reported roster of more than 4,000 influencers on YouTube, Twitch and TikTok. Clicks Talent is a West Hollywood talent agency that represents creators as clients in their own right, with roots in the early TikTok wave. One is buying outcomes for you. The other is managing the people you might want to buy from.

That distinction matters more than any feature list. If you brief ARCH. you are hiring a campaign team measured on cost per install. If you approach Clicks Talent you are usually negotiating access to represented creators. This comparison covers what each firm does, who each is built for and where a brand ends up needing something neither provides.

Free toolkit · 28 pages

The Creator Outreach Toolkit

12 email templates that get replies, a 50-point creator vetting checklist, rate negotiation scripts and a campaign tracker. Built from 4 years of running creator campaigns.

You are all set. Finish signing up now →
Something went wrong. Open the toolkit directly →

ARCH. vs Clicks Talent at a glance

The quick read on both firms, with Flinque shown for contrast.

FeatureARCH.Clicks TalentFlinque
ModelPerformance agencyTalent representationSelf-serve software
HeadquartersZagreb, CroatiaWest Hollywood, CaliforniaRemote, serving 25+ countries
Core focusGames and apps performanceCreator representationDiscovery and vetting
Roster or indexReported 4,000+ influencersRepresented creators only10M+ verified creators
Platforms emphasisedYouTube, Twitch and TikTokTikTok-led4 platforms
Reported clientsRevolut, BetterHelp and WargamingUber Eats, Warner Bros. and The Pokemon CompanySelf-serve, no client gate
PricingQuote per campaignQuote per dealFree $0, Starter $49/mo, Enterprise $150/mo

What ARCH. is

ARCH. is an influencer-only agency based in Zagreb, Croatia, built around performance marketing for games and apps. The stated focus is installs, cost per install, return on ad spend and retention, which is a narrower and more measurable brief than most influencer agencies take on. Reported figures put the roster at more than 4,000 influencers across YouTube, Twitch and TikTok, which suits the gaming and app categories where those three platforms carry the most weight.

Reported clients include Revolut, BetterHelp, Wargaming, Surfshark and SuperPlay. That mix says something useful about fit. Wargaming and SuperPlay are games companies, while Revolut, BetterHelp and Surfshark are app-first businesses that live or die on install economics. If your product is downloaded rather than shipped, ARCH. is speaking your language. One naming caution is worth carrying: this is ARCH. the games and apps agency, not the separate creator-marketing software sometimes listed under a similar name.

What Clicks Talent is

Clicks Talent is an influencer-only talent agency in West Hollywood, California. The word talent is doing real work in that description. Its business is representing creators, not buying media on behalf of brands. The agency built its position early in the TikTok cycle, which is still the platform most associated with its roster.

Reported clients include Uber Eats, Warner Bros. and The Pokemon Company, which points at entertainment and consumer campaigns rather than performance install work. For a brand, the practical consequence is that a conversation with Clicks Talent tends to start with which represented creators are available and on what terms. That is a good route to specific talent you already want. It is a less direct route if you have an outcome in mind and no particular creator attached to it.

Head to head

The honest comparison is not which agency is better but which problem you have. ARCH. is the right call when the brief is measurable and the category is games or apps, because the whole operation is pointed at installs and return rather than reach. Clicks Talent is the right call when you want particular creators, especially on TikTok when you are comfortable negotiating through their representation. Neither is a discovery tool. Both are relationship businesses with a quote at the end of the conversation. In both cases the pool you can reach is bounded by who the agency works with. That boundary is the thing brands underestimate. A roster of a reported 4,000 influencers is substantial for gaming, though it is still a roster. A talent agency's list is smaller again by design.

Where each one leaves a gap

Where ARCH. leaves a gap

  • The focus on games and apps is a strength inside those categories. A beauty or grocery brand will find the performance framing and the roster mix a poor match.
  • Reported roster size of more than 4,000 influencers is bounded. If a campaign needs creators outside that pool you are back to sourcing them yourself.
  • Pricing is quote-based per campaign. There is no published rate to sanity-check a proposal against before you enter a sales conversation.

Where Clicks Talent leaves a gap

  • Representation means the available pool is the represented roster. Creators outside it are not part of the offer.
  • The early TikTok focus concentrates strength on one platform. A campaign spanning YouTube and Instagram equally will need other partners alongside.
  • Talent deals are negotiated one at a time. Comparing several creators on audience quality before you commit is not something the model is built to do.

Where Flinque fits

Flinque is not an agency and does not pitch against either firm on service. It is self-serve software for the part of the job that comes before any agency conversation, which is working out who is worth contacting. Flinque indexes 10M+ verified creators across 4 platforms, with 200 data points per creator reported on each profile, so you can filter by niche, audience location and authenticity rather than accepting a roster as given.

The practical use is sequencing. Build a shortlist yourself on Flinque, check the audience data, then take a specific and defensible brief to ARCH. if the campaign is a games install play or to Clicks Talent if you want represented creators. Flinque is self-serve with no demo and no annual lock-in. The Free Plan is $0, Starter is $49 a month and Enterprise is $150 a month, so the vetting step costs less than a single agency discovery call. For brands running a handful of campaigns a year, that ordering keeps the agency conversation focused on delivery rather than on who exists.

Final thoughts

The takeaway

Reaching YouTube creators by email works best when you combine methodical research, ethical sourcing and respectful communication. Focus on publicly shared, business-oriented YouTube channel contact points and clear, value-driven proposals.

Over time, thoughtful YouTube influencer email outreach can build reliable, mutually beneficial relationships with channels across many niches. The brands that win long-term creator partnerships are those that treat outreach as relationship-building. Not just a numbers game.

Next step

Pick ARCH. for measurable games and apps campaigns, Clicks Talent for access to represented TikTok creators. Do the shortlisting first so the brief you hand over is already grounded in audience data.

Find and vet these creators yourself, free

10M+ verified creators across 4 platforms, 12 filters and a fake-follower score on every profile. No card.

FAQs

Common questions about ARCH. vs Clicks Talent

Quick answers to the questions brands and marketers ask most often.

What is the difference between ARCH. and Clicks Talent?

They are different businesses that share a label. ARCH. is a performance agency in Zagreb, Croatia that runs games and apps campaigns measured on installs, cost per install, return on ad spend and retention, working through a reported roster of more than 4,000 influencers. Clicks Talent is a talent agency in West Hollywood, California that represents creators, with roots in the early TikTok period. One buys outcomes for a brand. The other manages the creators a brand might book.

Which one is better for a mobile game launch?

ARCH. is the closer fit on stated focus. Its work is described around installs and retention for games and apps. Reported clients include Wargaming and SuperPlay, both games businesses. Clicks Talent can still be relevant if a specific represented creator has the right gaming audience, though the model is representation rather than performance delivery.

Do either publish pricing?

Neither publishes a rate card. ARCH. quotes per campaign and Clicks Talent negotiates per deal, which is normal for agencies and talent representation. The practical effect is that you cannot benchmark a proposal before entering a sales conversation, so it helps to arrive with your own view of which creators you want and why.

Can I reach creators outside their rosters?

Not through either firm. ARCH. works through its reported roster of more than 4,000 influencers and Clicks Talent works with the creators it represents. Anyone outside those pools has to be sourced another way, which is the main reason brands run a discovery step before the agency conversation rather than after it.

Which platforms does each emphasise?

ARCH. is described across YouTube, Twitch and TikTok, which reflects where gaming and app audiences concentrate. Clicks Talent is most associated with TikTok from its early position on that platform. Neither is presented as an even four-platform offer, so a campaign weighted to Instagram will need that gap covered separately.

Where does Flinque fit alongside them?

Flinque is software rather than a service, so it sits before the agency step. It indexes 10M+ verified creators across 4 platforms with 200 data points per creator reported, which lets you build and vet a shortlist yourself. The Free Plan is $0 with no card and no demo, so you can arrive at either agency with a specific brief instead of asking who is available.

Written & reviewed by Flinque Research Team

Influencer Marketing Research · View team →

Our research team specialises in influencer marketing strategy, creator analytics and outreach best practices. All content is reviewed for accuracy using live platform data and current industry standards.

📧 Creator outreach 📺 YouTube strategy 🔍 Contact research 🗓 Updated January 28 2026

Disclaimer: All information on this page is collected from publicly available sources, third-party search engines, AI-powered tools and general online research. We do not claim ownership of any external data and accuracy may vary. This content is for informational purposes only.