SociallyIn is a brand-side, full-service social media agency from Atlanta, founded in 2011. It runs a company's entire social presence, strategy, content, community, paid and influencer, across Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and Facebook, with national reach.
Influencer marketing is one service inside that wider offering, not the headline. For brands that want their whole social handled by one team, that breadth is the draw. But it shapes what you get and how it prices. Here is the honest read.
The verdict
SociallyIn is a strong pick if you want a single agency to own your entire social presence rather than just run influencer campaigns. Its 100 percent social focus and full-stack model mean influencer work sits alongside content, community and paid, all coordinated.
The trade-off is that influencer marketing is not its sole specialism and as a managed agency it prices on project and retainer scopes rather than a public rate. If you only need creator discovery, a full social agency is more than the job requires.
What SociallyIn does
SociallyIn manages the full social stack: strategy, content production, community management, paid social and influencer marketing, as one coordinated programme. The pitch is that a brand hands over its social presence and gets a team that runs all of it.
Its influencer work benefits from sitting next to content and paid, so creator campaigns plug into a wider social strategy rather than running in isolation. For brands that want joined-up social, that coordination is the real value.
Pricing
SociallyIn does not publish pricing. As a full-service agency it works on project and retainer scopes, so cost depends on which services you take and at what scale. A full social programme costs far more than a single influencer campaign.
Because it is managed, the spend lands as a retainer or project commitment rather than a subscription. Sizing it means a conversation about the scope of social work you want handled, not a glance at a rate card.
Pros and cons
The short version, weighed up:
| Strengths | Watch-outs |
|---|---|
| Owns the full social stack | Influencer is one service, not the focus |
| 100 percent social specialism | Pricing is undisclosed, scope-based |
| Coordinated content, paid and influencer | Fully managed, less direct control |
| National reach since 2011 | Broad agency for a narrow need |
Who it is for
SociallyIn fits brands that want a single agency to run their entire social presence, with influencer marketing folded into a coordinated programme and the budget for a managed scope. If you want all of social handled together, the breadth pays off.
It is a weaker fit if you only need creator discovery, want transparent pricing or prefer a tool you run yourself. For that narrower job, a self-serve discovery platform is leaner and cheaper.
How it compares to Flinque
SociallyIn runs your whole social presence, influencer included. Flinque does one part of that cheaply and directly: it lets your team find and vet creators. Where SociallyIn quotes a managed scope, Flinque gives you 10M verified creators across four platforms at published prices from free to $150 a month, with a fake-follower check on each.
They suit different needs. For a coordinated, full social programme run for you, SociallyIn fits. For finding and vetting creators yourself at a price you can read, Flinque is faster and far cheaper and many brands use it for discovery while keeping an agency for the broader social work.
Where SociallyIn fits in your stack
Deciding on SociallyIn is really a decision about how much of social you want to own. It is built for brands that would rather hand the whole presence to one team than assemble it in-house and that framing is the cleanest way to judge the fit.
Hand it off when social is not your core competence and you lack the headcount to run strategy, content, community, paid and influencer well. In that case a single coordinated agency beats a patchwork of freelancers and half-used tools and the influencer work benefits from sitting next to everything else.
Keep it in-house when you have the team and the appetite for control or when your only real gap is finding and vetting creators. Paying a full social agency to solve a discovery problem is expensive and a flat-price tool does that one job for a fraction of a retainer.
Many brands land on a hybrid. They run discovery and vetting themselves with a tool, keeping that control and cost in-house and bring an agency like SociallyIn in for the broader social work or the big coordinated pushes. That split gets you cheap, controlled discovery plus managed muscle where it counts.
So the decision rule is simple. If you need all of social handled, SociallyIn earns its scope. If you mainly need creators found and verified, start with a tool and add the agency only when the wider work genuinely demands it.
The takeaway
SociallyIn is a capable full-service social agency for brands that want their entire social presence owned by one team, with influencer marketing as one coordinated service. The breadth is the appeal and the catch.
If your real need is finding creators rather than handing off all of social, a flat-price tool covers it for far less.
Just need creator discovery? Try Flinque free and vet every audience at a flat price.