Trusted by 2,000+ brands and agencies across 25+ countries
Enter how many creators you are whitelisting, what you are spending in ads behind each one and the fee you were quoted on either model. The calculator totals the commitment, shows the whitelisting fee as a share of the media and works out the ad spend at which the two fee models cost the same. Every figure is one you typed.
| Line | How it is worked out | Amount |
|---|
Whitelisting is usually quoted either as a flat fee per creator per month or as a share of what you spend in ads behind them. The calculator prices whichever one you picked, then prices the other on the same numbers and reports the difference, so you never have to work out which quote is actually cheaper in your own situation.
A flat fee and a percentage cost the same at exactly one level of monthly ad spend, and that level is your flat fee divided by your percentage. Below it the flat fee is the expensive option. Above it the percentage is, because a flat fee stops growing and a percentage never does.
A whitelisting fee only means something next to the ad spend it unlocks. The calculator divides the fee by the media to show it as a share, and divides the whole commitment by the media to show what each dollar of ad spend actually costs you once every fee is counted.
Whitelisting means a creator gives your ad account permission to run paid ads from their handle. The post looks like it came from them because it did, and the targeting, the budget and the optimisation are yours. Some platforms call the same arrangement by other names, and the commercial shape is the same whichever label is used.
That shape produces a cost structure most people are not used to. You are not buying content and you are not buying a post. You are buying access, for a period, to an identity you do not own, and then spending your own media money through it. Three separate things, often quoted by three different mechanisms.
Keeping those apart matters because they scale differently. Content is a one-off per creator. Access can be flat or proportional. Media is whatever you choose to spend. Management is usually proportional to media. Tooling is usually per month regardless of anything. A total that blends all five together tells you very little about what happens when you change any one of them.
The calculator keeps each as its own line and then shows the total two ways, once as a cash figure and once as a multiple of the ad spend. The second reading is the one that scales with you.
The two common ways to price whitelisting access behave in opposite directions, and which is better for you depends entirely on how much you plan to spend behind each creator.
A flat fee per creator per month is predictable. It does not care how well the ads work or how much you put behind them. If a campaign goes well and you double the budget, the fee does not move, so your cost of access per dollar of media halves. If the campaign is small the fee is a large proportion of a small spend.
A share of ad spend is proportional. It starts small, which makes it easy to agree to, and it keeps growing for as long as you keep spending. If the campaign works and you scale it, the fee scales with it, which is sometimes framed as alignment and sometimes as a tax on your own success. Both framings are fair. What matters is the arithmetic.
There is also a practical difference in how the two behave under uncertainty. A flat fee lets you know the cost of access before you decide the budget. A percentage means you cannot know the fee until the campaign is over, because it depends on a number you have not spent yet. If you need a committed figure for an approval, the flat model gives you one and the percentage model does not.
The calculator asks which model you are costing, prices it, then prices the other one on the same inputs and shows the gap in cash. That second line is usually the fastest way to settle an argument about which quote is better, because the answer depends on your own spend and nobody else's.
Enter the creators, the months, the spend and both quoted fees, and the comparison appears with the crossover.
Each line names what it multiplied or divided, including which base a percentage was applied to.
There is no whitelisting rate in this page. It compares the two quotes you were actually given.
Price the content itself with the UGC calculator, total the whole programme with the cost calculator and fit it to a number with the budget calculator.
The arithmetic runs in your browser, so no spend, fee or partner name is sent anywhere.
There is exactly one level of monthly ad spend per creator at which a flat fee and a percentage of spend cost the same amount. Above it the percentage costs more. Below it the flat fee does. Finding it takes one division.
Divide the flat fee by the percentage expressed as a decimal and you have it. A flat fee of three hundred against a share of ten percent crosses over at three thousand of monthly spend per creator, because ten percent of three thousand is three hundred. The calculator does this whenever you have filled in both figures, and it reports the result as ad spend per creator per month so it is directly comparable to the box you entered.
One caveat worth stating. The crossover is about the fee only. It says nothing about which arrangement is better overall, because a flat deal and a percentage deal often differ in other ways too, such as how long the access lasts, how many creative variations you may run or whether the creator can withdraw. Settle the fee question with the arithmetic and then settle the rest on the terms.
On most whitelisting arrangements the ad spend dwarfs every fee in the deal. That is easy to forget when the negotiation is all about the fee, and it leads to a lot of effort spent on the smaller number.
The calculator puts the media at the top of the result for that reason, and shows every other line as a share of the total. If the fees together are a modest slice of the commitment, then the campaign will be won or lost on how well the media performs rather than on how hard you negotiated the access.
Two of the lines in a whitelisting deal are usually priced as a share of the media, the access fee on the percentage model and the management fee almost always. That makes the ad spend the base that drives the fees rather than an independent number, and it means increasing the budget increases the fees automatically.
That is the reason the calculator reports the total as a multiple of the ad spend. A figure such as a dollar and thirty cents committed for every dollar of media tells you the real price of running this campaign through somebody else's handle, and it stays meaningful whatever budget you end up choosing. The cash total does not, because it is tied to one budget assumption.
The working ad spend share is the same reading from the other direction. It is the proportion of your total commitment that actually reaches the auction and buys delivery. Everything else buys permission, content, coordination or tooling. There is no figure that share ought to be. It is simply worth knowing, especially when comparing a whitelisting plan against running the same media from your own brand handle, where the fees would not exist at all.
Save 50% on annual billing across paid plans.
Two lines of the result divide the total by the media. One gives the commitment per dollar of ad spend, the other gives the whitelisting fee as a percentage of the ad spend. Both exist because a cash total is only true for one budget and a ratio is true for all of them.
If you are not sure what you will spend, the ratio is the number to plan with. It tells you what each dollar of media costs once the access, the content, the management and the tooling are counted, so you can apply it to whatever budget you eventually get.
The cost per creator per month line is the last division and it is the one most useful for planning the shape of the programme. It divides everything by both the creator count and the months, so it answers the question of what adding one more creator for one more month costs, averaged across your own figures. That average is the right starting point for a conversation about scope, and the calculator makes it available before anybody has signed anything.
It holds no whitelisting fee, no management rate, no content price and no view on what access ought to cost. Every number in the result comes from a box you filled in, and an empty box counts as zero rather than as an assumption.
Whitelisting fees vary by creator, by platform, by how long the access runs, by how many creative variations you want and by how much of the creator's own audience the ads will reach. A single suggested figure would be wrong for nearly every reader, and it would be wrong inside a comparison that looked exact.
The calculator applies the management fee to the ad spend and prints that base on the line. If your partner charges on something else, work the amount out yourself and adjust the percentage until the line shows the figure you expect. Leaving it on the wrong base is the single easiest way to get a confident total that is quietly wrong by a large amount.
"We tested three platforms before landing on Flinque. The creator data is more reliable. The filters actually work. Our team spends half the time finding the right influencers now."
"Flinque replaced two tools we were paying for separately. Creator discovery and performance tracking in one place. And the data is actually accurate."
"Our campaign turnaround time dropped significantly after switching to Flinque. What used to take a full day of research now takes under an hour."
Each figure in this example was invented to make the comparison concrete. None of it is a fee anyone quoted, and your own quotes will drive the same comparison.
Say you are whitelisting 8 creators for 3 months, spending $2,500 per creator per month in ads. You have two quotes, a flat fee of $350 per creator per month and a share of ad spend at 12 percent, and you are costing the percentage model. Content is $600 per creator as a one-off, management is 10 percent of ad spend and the platform costs $200 a month.
The crossover line is the useful one here. At $2,500 of monthly spend per creator the percentage model wins by $1,200 across the whole arrangement. If the campaign works and you raise the spend to $3,500 per creator per month, the percentage fee grows to $10,080 while the flat fee stays at $8,400, and the better choice flips. On a three month deal that is a risk you can price. On a twelve month deal signed at the lower spend it is a decision you are stuck with.
The other number worth noticing is the $1.31 committed per dollar of media. Three quarters of the commitment is the ad spend itself, which is where the campaign will actually be won or lost. Negotiating the access fee down to nothing would improve the ratio to $1.19, which is worth having and is not where most of the leverage is.
The calculator is free and needs no signup. Which handles are worth running ads from is the harder question, and the full platform adds discovery, audience data and authenticity scoring.
It costs whatever you were quoted, and this page deliberately does not suggest a figure. Whitelisting fees vary by creator, by platform, by how long the access runs, by how many creative variations you want and by how much of the creator's audience the ads reach. What the calculator does is cost out the quote you were given, price the alternative fee model on the same inputs and show which is cheaper at your own level of ad spend.
It depends on how much you plan to spend behind each creator, and there is exactly one spend level where they cost the same. Divide the flat fee by the percentage expressed as a decimal to find it. Below that level the percentage is cheaper because the flat fee is large against a small spend. Above it the flat fee is cheaper because it stops growing and the percentage does not. The calculator works the crossover out from your own two quotes.
Because a whitelisting fee only means something next to the media it unlocks. The same fee is trivial behind a large budget and substantial behind a small one. Showing it as a percentage of ad spend makes those two cases distinguishable, and showing the whole commitment as a multiple of the media gives you a figure that stays useful whatever budget you end up approving.
Put it here if the creator is making content specifically for the whitelisted ads and you are paying for it separately from the access. Leave it blank if the access fee you were quoted already includes the content, because entering both would double count. If you are pricing a larger programme where whitelisting is only one part, the cost calculator is the better place to total everything and this one is for settling the access question.
Ad spend, and the result row prints the base it used so there is no ambiguity. That is the most common arrangement but it is not the only one. Some partners charge on total programme spend, which is a larger number for the same stated percentage. If yours works differently, adjust the percentage until the line shows the amount your contract actually names rather than leaving it on a base that does not match.
Yes. It is free and needs no signup or card. Everything runs in your browser, so no spend figure, fee or partner name is sent anywhere. It sits alongside the UGC pricing calculator for the content itself, the cost calculator for a whole programme and the budget calculator when the whole thing has to fit inside a number somebody already approved.
10M+ verified creators across 4 platforms, 12 filters and a fake-follower score on every profile. No card.