MoreInfluence is a white-glove, full-service influencer agency from Los Angeles, founded in 2021. It is influencer-agnostic, representing no talent of its own and works from access to more than 300M social users across most major platforms, tracking visits, clicks and promo-code usage.
As a managed, data-driven agency, MoreInfluence does not publish a rate card. Pricing is quoted around scope. Here is what that means.
What MoreInfluence is
MoreInfluence is a managed agency that stays neutral on talent, so it picks creators on fit rather than its own roster. It runs full-service, data-driven campaigns and measures performance through visits, clicks and promo-code redemptions across major platforms.
Because the service is white-glove and the model is performance-aware, you are buying managed execution and measurement, which shapes its pricing around campaign scope rather than seats.
The pricing
MoreInfluence does not publish pricing. As a white-glove agency it quotes per campaign, with cost shaped by the scope, the creators involved and the level of tracking and reporting you want. There is no public plan to compare.
Since the budget covers creator costs and managed execution, it lands as a campaign or retainer commitment rather than a monthly fee. Sizing it means a conversation about goals and measurement.
For a brand that wants neutral, data-driven creator selection handled for it, that managed pricing can be worth it. For a team that just needs to find creators, an agency is more than the job requires.
What drives the cost
The main drivers are campaign scope and the depth of tracking. More creators, more markets and closer measurement of clicks and promo codes all push the number up, since the agency is doing more hands-on work.
Creator tier and content volume factor in too. The influencer-agnostic, white-glove model means careful selection and reporting, which are priced into the managed fee.
Who it fits
MoreInfluence fits brands that want neutral, data-driven creator selection and managed execution with click and promo-code tracking and that have the budget for a white-glove program. If unbiased selection and measurement matter, that is its strength.
It is a weaker fit if you want transparent pricing, a tool you run yourself or simple discovery without managed measurement. Those needs point toward a self-serve platform.
Where Flinque fits
MoreInfluence quotes a managed, measured campaign. Flinque does the discovery half cheaply and directly and it is equally agnostic, since it represents no talent either. You get 10M verified creators across Instagram, YouTube, TikTok and X, twelve filters and a fake-follower check on every profile, at prices printed on the page: free to start, $49 a month for Starter, $150 a month for Enterprise. No quote, no retainer, no annual lock-in.
They suit different needs. For neutral, data-driven campaigns run for you, MoreInfluence fits. For finding and vetting creators yourself at a price you can read, Flinque is faster and far cheaper.
What to clarify before you sign
MoreInfluence's selling point is neutrality: it represents no talent, so it picks creators on fit rather than pushing a roster. That is worth paying for but only if you confirm the neutrality is real in practice, so ask directly how creators are sourced and whether any commercial ties shape the shortlist.
Pin down the tracking you are buying. The pitch includes measuring visits, clicks and promo-code usage and that measurement is part of what the white-glove fee covers. Clarify exactly which metrics you will get, how often and in what format, so the reporting matches what you need to prove results.
Scope the campaign precisely. Cost climbs with the number of creators, the markets and the depth of tracking, so a focused brief prices better than an open-ended one. Decide what a successful campaign looks like before you ask for a quote, not during the campaign.
Separate selection from execution in your head. You are paying for both careful, neutral creator selection and managed delivery. If your team can run delivery and you only struggle with finding the right creators, you may be paying white-glove rates for a problem a tool solves.
Which is the practical alternative. A flat-price discovery platform is equally agnostic, since it represents no talent either and it lets you find and vet creators yourself for a fixed fee, so you bring in a managed agency only when you genuinely want the execution handled.
The bottom line is to verify the neutrality and value the tracking, then scope tightly. MoreInfluence's agnostic, white-glove model is worth paying for when you genuinely need unbiased selection and managed measurement of clicks and promo codes and overkill when your only real struggle is finding the right creators. Confirm how creators are sourced, pin down exactly which metrics you will receive and define success before you ask for a quote. If your team can run delivery and just needs discovery, a flat-price tool is equally agnostic, since it represents no talent either and it does the finding and vetting for a fixed fee while you keep execution in-house.
The takeaway
MoreInfluence prices as a white-glove, influencer-agnostic agency, quoting around scope and the depth of tracking rather than a public rate. For brands wanting neutral selection and measurement, that is the appeal.
If your real need is finding creators rather than running a managed campaign, a flat-price tool covers it for far less.
Want to find creators at a flat price? Try Flinque free and vet every audience before you pay.