Moburst vs IMA: Which to Pick
Both list Samsung as a client, so neither is small. What they actually do could hardly be more different. One engineers mobile app growth, with influencer as one lever inside it. The other runs global influencer campaigns as its whole business. Your metric decides this.
Which one is right for you
Three buyers, three picks. Find the column that sounds like your team.
Choose Moburst if
- Your metric is installs, retention or app growth
- You want ASO, user acquisition and creative together
- Influencer is one growth lever, not the campaign
Choose IMA if
- Your goal is influencer reach and brand campaigns
- You want genuinely global creator work
- You want the resources of a large production group
Choose Flinque if
- You want to find and vet creators yourself with no sales call
- You want flat published pricing you can start free
- You want to run discovery in-house, not hire an agency
Moburst vs IMA vs Flinque
Fourteen factors across all three, from what each one is actually built to move. Flinque is the flat-price software option on the right.
| Factor | Moburst | IMA | Best valueFlinque |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Mobile app growth and installs | Global influencer campaigns | Teams running discovery in-house |
| Type | Mobile-first growth agency | Full-service global influencer agency | Self-serve software |
| Headquarters | New York, US/UK/Israel offices | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Remote, serving 25+ countries |
| Core focus | ASO, user acquisition, media, creative | Global influencer campaigns | Discovery and vetting |
| Primary metric | Installs and retention | Reach and brand impact | Creators found and vetted |
| Influencer role | One growth lever | The whole business | The whole tool |
| Ownership | Independent | Inside Monks, formerly S4 Capital | Independent |
| Reported clients | Google, Uber and Reddit | Diesel, Tommy Hilfiger and Nivea | Self-serve, no client gate |
| Shared client | Samsung | Samsung | Self-serve, no gate |
| Creator pool | Agency relationships | Agency relationships | 10M+ verified creators |
| Published pricing | None | None | Free $0, Starter $49, Enterprise $150 |
| Self-serve search | No | No | Yes |
| Free tier | No | No | Yes, no card |
| Data per creator | Not published | Not published | 200 data points reported |
How we compared: Engagement models and minimums come from each agency's own site and public reporting and client reviews, cross-checked and dated June 2026. Where an agency hides its pricing we say undisclosed rather than guess a number. The verdicts are ours, not the agencies'.
What each agency actually does
What is Moburst
Moburst is a mobile-first growth agency, which is a different animal from an influencer shop. Working from New York with offices in the US, UK and Israel, it does app store optimisation, user acquisition, media buying and creative, all pointed at one outcome: getting an app installed and keeping people using it. Reported clients include Google, Uber, Samsung and Reddit, which are apps and platforms rather than consumer-goods brands, a spread that tells you where its expertise sits.
Influencer marketing exists inside Moburst's toolkit as one lever in a growth system rather than the headline. That framing is the thing to weigh. If your real objective is installs and retention and creators are one of several tactics that might move those numbers, Moburst is built to decide when influencer helps and when a different lever works better. If your objective is a brand influencer campaign judged on reach and resonance, a growth agency is optimising for a metric you may not be measuring.
What Moburst does well
- Genuine depth in app growth, ASO and UA
- Reported clients are major apps and platforms
- Influencer chosen against a growth metric, not by default
- Offices across the US, UK and Israel
Where it falls short
- Not primarily an influencer agency
- Optimises for installs, not brand reach
- Influencer is one lever, not a specialism
- No published pricing and no self-serve search
What is IMA
IMA is the influencer specialist of the pair. Unlike Moburst, that is its whole business. The Influencer Marketing Agency runs global campaigns from Amsterdam and sits inside Monks, the group formed when S4 Capital absorbed it into MediaMonks in 2019 and rebranded to Monks in 2024. That ownership brings production capacity and international reach a standalone shop could not fund, with your account being one of many the group holds as the trade.
Reported clients include Diesel, Tommy Hilfiger, Nivea and Samsung, a run of international consumer brands that fits an influencer-first, brand-led agency. One caution: published descriptions of IMA's creator network vary widely by source, so treat any headcount figure you are quoted as something to verify rather than a specification. Where Moburst asks how creators serve app growth, IMA asks how a global influencer campaign should be built, which is a fundamentally different starting question.
What IMA does well
- Influencer marketing is its entire business
- Global reach with group production capacity
- Reported clients are international consumer brands
- Amsterdam base suits European and global work
Where it falls short
- Inside a group, so your account ranks against others
- Published network-size figures are inconsistent
- Not a mobile-growth or app-install specialist
- No published pricing and no self-serve search
Moburst vs IMA head to head
The shared Samsung logo hides how little these two overlap. The real question is what number you are trying to move. If it is app installs, retention or mobile growth, Moburst is engineered for exactly that and treats influencer as one tactic among several it can deploy or skip. If it is influencer reach and brand impact at global scale, IMA is built around that and Moburst would be pointing its growth machinery at a goal it is not tuned for. Name the metric first, then the choice stops being close.
Both keep the creator pool behind a managed relationship and neither publishes pricing, so verification before signing is limited. Flinque is the opposite on that point: 10M+ verified creators across 4 platforms, each with a fake-follower score and 200 reported data points, at $0 to start and $49 a month after, whether creators are one lever in a growth plan or the whole campaign.
Which should you actually pick
Forget the pitch decks for a second. Match the partner to the situation you are in.
Your metric is installs
You want an app grown, users acquired and retained. Influencer is one lever in that, which is exactly how Moburst treats it.
→ Pick MoburstYour goal is a global campaign
You want influencer reach and brand impact across markets, with production behind it. That is IMA's whole business inside Monks.
→ Pick IMAYou just want the creators
Neither hands you a searchable pool. Flinque indexes 10M+ verified creators with a fake-follower score on each, free to start with no card.
→ Pick FlinqueYou want to verify before committing
Both quote against a scope and publish little. Flinque reports 200 data points per creator so a shortlist rests on data, not a pitch.
→ Start with FlinqueFlinque: verified discovery at a flat price
If both feel like too much retainer and too little control, Flinque does one job and does it well. Find and vet real creators yourself, fast, then run the campaign in-house. No pitch deck, no monthly retainer, no discovery call to learn the price.
- 10M+ verified creators
- 4 platforms: IG, YouTube, TikTok, X
- 200 data points per creator
- 12 search filters
- Fake-follower check on every profile
- Free, $49, $150, published
See Flinque in action
Short walkthroughs on pricing, discovery and vetting from the Flinque team.
Influencer Discovery Platforms That We Made Easy and Affordable
Find Influencers for $49 a Month: Flinque vs Modash and HypeAuditor (2026)
Common questions about Moburst and IMA
What is the difference between Moburst and IMA?
Which suits an app launch?
Which suits a global brand campaign?
Why do both list Samsung?
Does Moburst do influencer marketing at all?
How reliable is IMA's stated network size?
How much do they cost?
Is there a software alternative to both?
Written & reviewed by Flinque Research Team
Influencer Marketing Research · View team →
Our research team specialises in influencer marketing strategy, creator analytics and platform comparisons. Details on this page were verified against agency sites, public reporting and client review platforms in June 2026.
Disclaimer: Information here is collected from publicly available sources, third-party review sites and vendor pages. Pricing and features change, so confirm current details with each provider before buying. This content is for informational purposes only.
More comparisons
inBeat vs Moburst
A micro-influencer and UGC agency against a mobile-growth shop.
Read article →ComparisonsCure Media vs IMA
A Stockholm category specialist against a global agency inside Monks.
Read article →ComparisonsDisrupt vs IMA
A London performance-led shop against an Amsterdam global agency.
Read article →