Rather than a fixed roster of Texas-based names, the useful version of this is a location filter. What usually matters is audience location, since a Texas creator can have followers nationwide. For a Texas campaign, confirm the audience is genuinely there, not just the creator's home base.
My brief specifies creators in one state and I am not sure that is the right constraint. What influencers live in Texas?
Location is easy to filter on and rarely the thing that matters. Ask where the audience is before asking where the creator is, because the two correlate much less than people assume.
If you genuinely need local, look for local references in the content rather than a location field. Those are much harder to fake and they tell you the audience is local too.
This reads as a location query and the honest, useful answer is to treat it as a filter rather than expect a fixed list of named people. Texas is a large market with plenty of creators but where a creator lives is only half the question and often the less important half.
A creator based in Texas can have an audience spread across the country, while a creator elsewhere might have a strongly Texas-based following. So if you are running a campaign that depends on reaching people in Texas, a regional launch, a local event, a state-specific offer, the number that matters is where the audience actually is.
Filtering on audience geography, then verifying it, beats chasing a roster of Texas addresses. Flinque supports this by letting you filter for creators and check that their audience genuinely concentrates in your target location, then vet that the following is authentic. That turns a vague who lives in Texas question into a precise targeting decision grounded in real audience data.