Ubiquitous vs IMA: Which to Pick in 2026
A data-driven TikTok-first agency against Europe's largest full-service shop. One scores creators by median views and predicts which partnerships hit, the other brings worldwide production scale under S4 Capital. Here is which fits, plus a software option.
Skip the manual hunt
Search 10M+ verified creators by niche, engagement and audience quality, then export contacts. Free to start.
Which one is right for you
Three buyers, three picks. Find the column that sounds like your team.
Choose Ubiquitous if
- You want TikTok-first reach
- You want creators scored by median views
- You want predictive partnership picks
Choose IMA if
- You want European full-service scale
- You want worldwide production muscle
- You want S4 Capital and MediaMonks backing
Choose Flinque if
- You want verified creators and fake-follower checks with no sales call
- You want flat published pricing you can start free
- You want to run discovery in-house, not hand it to an agency
Ubiquitous vs IMA vs Flinque
Fourteen factors across all three, from agency type to real minimums. Flinque is the flat-price software option on the right.
| Factor | Ubiquitous | IMA | Best valueFlinque |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | TikTok-first and DTC brands | Brands wanting European scale | Teams running discovery in-house |
| Agency type | Data-driven TikTok-first agency | Europe's largest full-service agency | Self-serve software, not an agency |
| Engagement model | Custom, campaign-based | Custom, full-service | Flat monthly subscription |
| Typical minimum | Undisclosed | Undisclosed | Free, then $49/mo |
| Published pricing | No | No | $0 to $150/mo, public |
| Creator network | 14,000+ roster, median-view scored | Worldwide creator reach | 10M+ verified, 200 data points each |
| Platforms covered | TikTok-first, all social | All platforms, global | Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, X |
| Services | Campaigns, predictive matching | Strategy, creative, production | Discovery, vetting and audience data |
| Campaign management | fully managed | fully managed | You run it, software assists |
| Content and usage rights | Median-view scoring, not followers | Worldwide production scale | You negotiate directly with creators |
| Paid amplification | Predictive ML on partnerships | Backed by S4 and MediaMonks | Run your own whitelisting |
| Measurement and reporting | 300+ businesses served | Europe's largest, full-service | Audience and fake-follower data built in |
| Team and locations | Los Angeles, data-built | Amsterdam, founded 2010 | Software with support included |
| Time to launch | After scoping and strategy | After scoping and strategy | Shortlist in minutes on the free plan |
How we compared: Engagement models and minimums come from each agency's own site plus public reporting and client reviews, cross-checked and dated June 2026. Where an agency hides its pricing we say undisclosed rather than guess a number. The verdicts are ours, not the agencies'.
What each agency actually does
What is Ubiquitous
Ubiquitous made repeatable virality its whole business. Los Angeles based, full-service and data-built, it draws on a creator roster it pegs beyond 14,000 carrying billions of combined followers, tilting TikTok-first while operating across the main social platforms. Its true edge is the method: instead of ordering creators by follower totals, it grades them on median views, a steadier measure of who genuinely gets seen, then runs predictive machine learning to forecast which brand-creator pairings will work before a campaign goes live. That data backbone has served over 300 businesses, including Lyft, Disney, Target, Amazon and Netflix. The pitch is repeatable reach: virality treated as something you can engineer with the right signals, not hope for. Against IMA's European full-service scale, Ubiquitous is the data-driven TikTok-first agency.
Rates are custom and unposted, quoted per campaign, as managed shops price. The buy is engineered reach: a 14,000-plus roster scored on median views rather than follower counts, predictive ML that calls which partnerships hit and a TikTok-first focus where short-form lives. For a brand that wants repeatable virality backed by data, that method is the draw. The tradeoffs follow. It leans TikTok and short-form, so a brand wanting broad multi-market European delivery or heavy production gets a narrower fit. There is no self-serve tier here. The campaign model suits bursts over always-on work. For a brand that wants European full-service scale with worldwide production, IMA runs a different play.
What Ubiquitous does well
- Grades creators on median views, not followers
- Predictive ML forecasts which pairings work
- A roster it pegs beyond 14,000
- TikTok-first reach delivered at scale
Where it falls short
- TikTok and short-form leaning
- Narrower for broad European delivery
- No self-serve tier, fully managed
- Campaign model suits bursts over always-on
What is IMA
IMA operates as a full-service influencer agency at the upper end of the European market. Founded in Amsterdam in 2010 by Emilie Tabor and Maddie Raedts, it wagered early on creators and built itself into what it bills as Europe's biggest influencer agency. Its strength is scale joined to production muscle. Once merged with MediaMonks under S4 Capital, it can match influencer strategy to worldwide creative and production capability, a reach a standalone shop rarely manages. It runs full-service across all the main platforms, handling strategy, creative and execution for brands that want a heavyweight European partner with global production behind it. The model is fully managed, built for committed budgets and big campaigns rather than lean tests. That European-scale, production-backed model is its signature. Next to Ubiquitous's TikTok-first method, IMA is the European full-service heavyweight.
Pricing is custom and unpublished, scoped per campaign, the managed-agency norm. What you are buying is European scale with production muscle: full-service strategy, creative and execution across all platforms, plus worldwide production capability through MediaMonks and S4 Capital. For a brand that wants a heavyweight European partner with global production, that reach is the draw. The tradeoffs follow. It is built for committed budgets and big campaigns, so a brand wanting a lean test or pure TikTok-first data work gets a heavier fit. There is no self-serve tier here. The full-service model assumes you want the whole thing handled. For a brand that wants data-driven TikTok-first campaigns, Ubiquitous is the other route.
What IMA does well
- Europe's biggest influencer agency by its billing
- Sits under S4 Capital with MediaMonks
- Worldwide creative and production scale
- Full-service work across all platforms
Where it falls short
- Built for big budgets, not lean tests
- Heavier than a TikTok-first data shop
- No self-serve tier, fully managed
- Custom pricing, scoping call required
Head to head
The split here is TikTok-first data versus European full-service scale. Ubiquitous scores creators on median views and predicts which partnerships land, TikTok-first. IMA brings worldwide production and creative scale under S4 Capital, full-service across Europe. One engineers repeatable short-form reach. The other is a European heavyweight with global production.
Pick by whether you want a data-driven TikTok-first agency or European full-service scale. Neither is the do-it-yourself discovery middle: 10M verified creators across four platforms with a fake-follower score on each, at one published price, where you pick the creators yourself.
Which should you actually pick
Forget the pitch decks for a second. Match the partner to the situation you are in.
You want TikTok-first reach engineered
You want creators scored on median views and partnerships predicted by ML, TikTok-first. Ubiquitous is built for that.
→ Pick UbiquitousYou want European full-service scale
You want a heavyweight European partner with worldwide production through S4 Capital and MediaMonks. IMA fits.
→ Pick IMAYou want to run discovery in-house
No retainer, no scoping call. You want to search 10M verified creators across four platforms with a fake-follower check on each. Start free on Flinque and upgrade at $49 only if you keep using it.
→ Pick FlinqueYou want verified creators without a retainer
Both agencies run managed work and quote custom. Flinque's free plan lets you find and vet verified creators with no card, then scales at a flat $49 a month.
→ Start with FlinqueFlinque: verified discovery at a flat price
If both feel like too much retainer and too little control, Flinque does one job and does it well. Find and vet real creators yourself, fast, then run the campaign in-house. No pitch deck, no monthly retainer, no discovery call to learn the price.
- 10M+ verified creators
- 4 platforms: IG, YouTube, TikTok, X
- 200 data points per creator
- 12 search filters
- Fake-follower check on every profile
- Free, $49, $150, published
See Flinque in action
Short walkthroughs on pricing, discovery and vetting from the Flinque team.
Influencer Discovery Platforms That We Made Easy and Affordable
Find Influencers for $49 a Month: Flinque vs Modash and HypeAuditor (2026)
Common questions about Ubiquitous and IMA
What is the main difference between Ubiquitous and IMA?
Which is more affordable, Ubiquitous or IMA?
Which should I pick for TikTok?
How does each find creators?
What makes IMA different?
What is Ubiquitous best for?
Who should pick IMA over Ubiquitous?
Is there a software alternative to both agencies?
Find your next 10 creators in the next 10 minutes
Free plan. No credit card. Verified contacts included.
Start free, no card →