★ Labor Day · 30% off forever 30% off Starter and Enterprise, forever, with code FLINQUE30 COPY
New Flinque AI now scores creator authenticity in real time across 4 platforms. See how
★ Labor Day: 30% off forever with code FLINQUE30Ends Sept 10
Influencer Marketing

Ubiquitous vs IMA: What Happened to IMA

Home › Comparisons › Ubiquitous vs IMA Agency comparison · Updated June 12, 2026 Ubiquitous vs IMA: What Happened to IMA

FFlinque Research Team· June 2026 · 7 min read
10M+verified creators indexed
4.9/5across 2,000+ reviews
200data points per creator
Agency comparison · Updated June 12, 2026

Ubiquitous vs IMA: What Happened to IMA

One of these is not a live option. IMA stopped being a hireable brand in 2019, when MediaMonks merged with it. Ubiquitous is the side you can actually brief.

Short answer: pick Ubiquitous for data-driven TikTok-first campaigns, IMA only as history, because The 2019 merger ended IMA as a brand; Monks carries the practice. Or Flinque if you would rather find and vet verified creators in-house at a flat price you can start free.
4.9/5 across 2,000+ reviews10M+ verified creatorsUsed by Vodafone, Hyatt and Abbott
The 5-second answer

Skip the manual hunt

Search 10M+ verified creators by niche, engagement and audience quality, then export contacts. Free to start.

Which one is right for you

Three buyers, three picks. Find the column that sounds like your team.

Choose Ubiquitous if

  • You want TikTok-first reach
  • You want creators scored by median views
  • You want predictive partnership picks

Look up IMA if

  • You want the record, not a recommendation
  • You are auditing an old shortlist
  • You are tracing where the work moved
Free, no card

Choose Flinque if

  • You want verified creators and fake-follower checks with no sales call
  • You want flat published pricing you can start free
  • You want to run discovery in-house, not hand it to an agency
Side by side
🔍 Try it: check any creator's real engagement

Ubiquitous vs IMA vs Flinque

The factors below are set out for both. Only Ubiquitous is a live option. IMA is a retired brand: it merged into MediaMonks in 2019 and the work sits inside Monks. Flinque is the flat-price software option on the right.

FactorUbiquitousIMABest valueFlinque
Best forTikTok-first and DTC brandsNot available, brand retiredTeams running discovery in-house
Agency typeData-driven TikTok-first agencyEurope's largest full-service agencySelf-serve software, not an agency
Engagement modelCustom, campaign-basedCustom, full-serviceFlat monthly subscription
Typical minimumUndisclosedUndisclosedFree, then $49/mo
Published pricingNoNone, nor any at Monks$0 to $150/mo, public
Creator network14,000+ roster, median-view scoredWorldwide creator reach10M+ verified, 200 data points each
Platforms coveredTikTok-first, all socialAll platforms, globalInstagram, YouTube, TikTok, X
ServicesCampaigns, predictive matchingStrategy, creative, productionDiscovery, vetting and audience data
Campaign managementfully managedfully managedYou run it, software assists
Content and usage rightsMedian-view scoring, not followersWorldwide production scaleYou negotiate directly with creators
Paid amplificationPredictive ML on partnershipsBacked by S4 and MediaMonksRun your own whitelisting
Measurement and reporting300+ businesses servedNot availableAudience and fake-follower data built in
Team and locationsLos Angeles, data-builtAmsterdam, until 2019Software with support included
Time to launchAfter scoping and strategyAfter scoping and strategyShortlist in minutes on the free plan

How we compared: Engagement models and minimums come from each agency's own site plus public reporting and client reviews, cross-checked and dated June 2026. Where an agency hides its pricing we say undisclosed rather than guess a number. The verdicts are ours, not the agencies'.

The detail

What each agency actually does

What is Ubiquitous

Los AngelesTikTok-firstData-built14,000+ roster

Ubiquitous made repeatable virality its whole business. Los Angeles based, full-service and data-built, it draws on a creator roster it pegs beyond 14,000 carrying billions of combined followers, tilting TikTok-first while operating across the main social platforms. Its true edge is the method: instead of ordering creators by follower totals, it grades them on median views, a steadier measure of who genuinely gets seen, then runs predictive machine learning to forecast which brand-creator pairings will work before a campaign goes live. That data backbone has served over 300 businesses, including Lyft, Disney, Target, Amazon and Netflix. The pitch is repeatable reach: virality treated as something you can engineer with the right signals, not hope for. Against IMA's European full-service scale, Ubiquitous is the data-driven TikTok-first agency.

Rates are custom and unposted, quoted per campaign, as managed shops price. The buy is engineered reach: a 14,000-plus roster scored on median views rather than follower counts, predictive ML that calls which partnerships hit and a TikTok-first focus where short-form lives. For a brand that wants repeatable virality backed by data, that method is the draw. The tradeoffs follow. It leans TikTok and short-form, so a brand wanting broad multi-market European delivery or heavy production gets a narrower fit. There is no self-serve tier here. The campaign model suits bursts over always-on work. That is not a comparison IMA can be part of any more.

What Ubiquitous does well

  • Grades creators on median views, not followers
  • Predictive ML forecasts which pairings work
  • A roster it pegs beyond 14,000
  • TikTok-first reach delivered at scale

Where it falls short

  • TikTok and short-form leaning
  • Narrower for broad European delivery
  • No self-serve tier, fully managed
  • Campaign model suits bursts over always-on

What IMA was

Retired brandMerged 2019Now MonksAmsterdam, historically

What a searcher needs to know first is that IMA is not a business you can engage. The record is clear: imagency.com redirects to the Monks influencer marketing page and monks.com/ima returns a 404. S4 Capital folded it into MediaMonks in August 2019.

The parent rebranded twice more, in 2021 and again in 2024. It billed itself as Europe's largest full-service influencer agency, a claim it made in 2019. No rate card or minimum appears on the Monks influencer page; it routes to an enquiry form.

A brand that wanted IMA should be talking to Monks. No current network figure exists for the Monks influencer practice, so the 2019 number should not be updated by guesswork.

What IMA was known for

  • A team of 85 digital experts at the 2019 merger
  • A network S4 Capital put at 40,000 influencers in 2019
  • Clients S4 Capital named including Heineken and Diesel
  • Fashion and beauty campaign work

Why it is not a live option

  • The brand no longer exists to hire
  • Nothing first-party survives at the old domain
  • No IMA reference survives on the Monks page
  • The Monks page never uses the name

Head to head

These two are not weighed against each other on the usual terms. The merger with S4 Capital's MediaMonks was announced in August 2019. What a searcher needs to know first is that IMA is not a supplier you can appoint. The record is clear: following imagency.com lands on Monks and the Monks page carries no IMA reference at all. This point cannot be answered for IMA, which does not trade.

By scenario

Which should you actually pick

Forget the pitch decks for a second. Match the partner to the situation you are in.

You are researching IMA

That comparison does not hold, because IMA is no longer trading.

→ Read the history

You want to run discovery in-house

No retainer, no scoping call. You want to search 10M+ verified creators across four platforms with a fake-follower check on each. Start free on Flinque and upgrade at $49 only if you keep using it.

→ Pick Flinque

You want verified creators without a retainer

Both agencies run managed work and quote custom. Flinque's free plan lets you find and vet verified creators with no card, then scales at a flat $49 a month.

→ Start with Flinque
A third option

Flinque: verified discovery at a flat price

If both feel like too much retainer and too little control, Flinque does one job and does it well. Find and vet real creators yourself, fast, then run the campaign in-house. No pitch deck, no monthly retainer, no discovery call to learn the price.

  • 10M+ verified creators
  • 4 platforms: IG, YouTube, TikTok, X
  • 200 data points per creator
  • 12 search filters
  • Fake-follower check on every profile
  • Free, $49, $150, published
Watch

See Flinque in action

Short walkthroughs on pricing, discovery and vetting from the Flinque team.

Influencer Discovery Platforms That We Made Easy and Affordable

Find Influencers for $49 a Month: Flinque vs Modash and HypeAuditor (2026)

FAQs

Common questions about Ubiquitous and IMA

What is the main difference between Ubiquitous and IMA?
The important difference is status. Ubiquitous is a live business you can brief. IMA cannot be hired. MediaMonks, part of S4 Capital, merged with it in August 2019. This is easy to verify: the old domain now lands on Monks, while monks.com/ima is a 404.
Which is more affordable, Ubiquitous or IMA?
Only Ubiquitous is a real choice here. Since the 2019 merger there has been no IMA to engage, only Monks. If you specifically wanted IMA, approach Monks.
Which should I pick for TikTok?
Ubiquitous, on availability alone. Since the 2019 merger there has been no IMA to engage, only Monks. Monks is where the IMA work went.
How does each find creators?
The only sourced scale figures are S4 Capital's: 40,000 influencers in network and 85 digital experts. S4 Capital repeated the claim that it was Europe's largest full-service influencer agency. Either way it is a historical figure, because IMA is not trading.
What makes IMA different?
IMA cannot be engaged today, which two checks settle it imagency.com redirects to the Monks influencer marketing page and monks.com/ima returns a 404 makes plain. S4 Capital folded it into MediaMonks in August 2019.
What is Ubiquitous best for?
The evidence is straightforward following imagency.com lands on Monks and the Monks page carries no IMA reference at all. Anyone who came here for it should know IMA is not an agency you can hire. The merger with S4 Capital's MediaMonks was announced in August 2019.
Can you still pick IMA over Ubiquitous?
Ubiquitous, on availability alone. Since the 2019 merger there has been no IMA to engage, only Monks. A reader who meant IMA should be looking at Monks.
Is there a software alternative to both agencies?
Flinque. It covers 10M+ verified creators across four platforms with 12 filters and a fake-follower check on every profile, at flat public pricing: Free at $0, Starter at $49 a month and Enterprise at $150. It is a lean discovery and vetting tool rather than a managed agency.

Find your next 10 creators in the next 10 minutes

Free plan. No credit card. Verified contacts included.

F
Written & reviewed by

Flinque Research TeamView team →

Influencer Marketing Analysts

Our research team specialises in influencer marketing strategy, creator analytics and platform comparisons. Details on this page were verified against agency sites, public reporting and client review platforms in June 2026.