★ Labor Day · 30% off forever 30% off Starter and Enterprise, forever, with code FLINQUE30 COPY
New Flinque AI now scores creator authenticity in real time across 4 platforms. See how
★ Labor Day: 30% off forever with code FLINQUE30Ends Sept 10
Influencer Marketing

LTK vs IMA: What Happened to IMA

Home › Comparisons › LTK vs IMA Agency comparison · Updated June 12, 2026 LTK vs IMA: What Happened to IMA

FFlinque Research Team· June 2026 · 7 min read
10M+verified creators indexed
4.9/5across 2,000+ reviews
200data points per creator
Agency comparison · Updated June 12, 2026

LTK vs IMA: What Happened to IMA

One of these is not a live option. IMA is a retired brand: it merged into MediaMonks in 2019 and the work sits inside Monks. LTK is the side you can actually brief.

Short answer: pick LTK for shoppable creator commerce on a self-service platform, IMA only as history, because IMA was absorbed into MediaMonks in 2019 and the brand has not existed since. Or Flinque if you would rather find and vet verified creators in-house at a flat price you can start free.
4.9/5 across 2,000+ reviews10M+ verified creatorsUsed by Vodafone, Hyatt and Abbott
The 5-second answer

Skip the manual hunt

Search 10M+ verified creators by niche, engagement and audience quality, then export contacts. Free to start.

Which one is right for you

Three buyers, three picks. Find the column that sounds like your team.

Choose LTK if

  • You sell retail products through creators
  • You want shoppable links and commerce
  • You want a published-tier brand platform

Look up IMA if

  • You are tracing where the work moved
  • You are checking whether IMA still trades
  • You arrived on this name and meant Monks
Free, no card

Choose Flinque if

  • You want verified creators and fake-follower checks with no sales call
  • You want flat published pricing you can start free
  • You want a lean discovery tool, not a commerce platform or agency
Side by side
🔍 Try it: check any creator's real engagement

LTK vs IMA vs Flinque

The factors below are set out for both. Only LTK is a live option. IMA no longer trades under its own name; the 2019 merger put the work inside Monks. Flinque is the flat-price software option on the right.

FactorLTKIMABest valueFlinque
Best forRetail and commerce brandsNot available, brand retiredTeams running discovery in-house
Agency typeCreator-commerce platformFull-service influencer agencySelf-serve software, not an agency
Engagement modelPublished brand-platform tiersCustom, enterprise scopeFlat monthly subscription
Typical minimumFrom ~$5K/year, scalingUndisclosedFree, then $49/mo
Published pricingself-service platformNone, nor any at Monks$0 to $150/mo, public
Creator network~350,000 curated creatorsGlobal creator access10M+ verified, 200 data points each
Platforms coveredShoppable links, retail focusAll social platforms, globalInstagram, YouTube, TikTok, X
ServicesCreator commerce, affiliate salesStrategy, creative, productionDiscovery, vetting and audience data
Campaign managementSelf-service or managedfully managedYou run it, software assists
Content and usage rightsShoppable-link economyS4 Capital and MediaMonks scaleYou negotiate directly with creators
Paid amplificationRetail-sales attributionLargest in EuropeRun your own whitelisting
Measurement and reportingBest for retail commerceNot availableAudience and fake-follower data built in
Team and locationsDallas, founded 2011Amsterdam, until 2019Software with support included
Time to launchSign up on the brand platformAfter scoping and strategyShortlist in minutes on the free plan

How we compared: Engagement models and minimums come from each agency's own site plus public reporting and client reviews, cross-checked and dated June 2026. Where an agency hides its pricing we say undisclosed rather than guess a number. The verdicts are ours, not the agencies'.

The detail

What each agency actually does

What is LTK

DallasFounded 2011Creator commerceSelf-service

LTK turned the shoppable link into a whole economy. Launched in Dallas in 2011 by Amber and Baxter Box under the rewardStyle name, later the company behind the LIKEtoKNOW.it app and now just LTK, it brands itself the originator of creator commerce: a system where creators publish shoppable posts and earn when their followers buy, wiring social content straight to retail purchases. The approach is commerce-led, anchored by a curated network it counts near 350,000 creators plus a shopping app where people browse and buy creator-picked products. The pull for brands is measurable retail results, because the setup attributes sales back to creator content instead of merely counting impressions. It operates as a self-service brand platform with published tiers, unusual in a market full of custom quotes. Against IMA's full-service agency model, LTK is the creator-commerce platform.

Pricing is rare in its openness here: the Brand Platform lists published tiers, historically opening near a 5,000 dollar yearly fee then climbing to enterprise plans, while creators take commission on the sales they drive. What you are buying is creator commerce wired to retail: shoppable links, a near-350,000-creator network and sales attribution that ties content to purchases, all run through a self-service platform. For a retail or e-commerce brand chasing measurable sales, that model is the draw. The tradeoffs follow the focus. It is commerce-first, so a brand wanting broad awareness storytelling rather than shoppable retail gets a narrower tool, the self-service platform expects your team to run campaigns. And it is built around retail categories. No current position exists for IMA on this.

What LTK does well

  • Brands itself the originator of creator commerce
  • A curated network near 350,000 creators
  • Shoppable posts wiring content to retail buys
  • Published tiers on a self-service platform

Where it falls short

  • Commerce-first, narrower for awareness work
  • Self-service expects your team to run it
  • Built around retail categories
  • Less suited to pure brand storytelling

What IMA was

Retired brandMerged 2019Now MonksAmsterdam, historically

Anyone who came here for it should know IMA cannot be engaged today. MediaMonks, part of S4 Capital, merged with it in August 2019. The proof sits on the companies' own pages: the agency's own domain forwards to Monks and no IMA-branded page survives anywhere on it.

The category mix was broad, from fashion and beauty to automotive and travel. No rate card or minimum appears on the Monks influencer page; it routes to an enquiry form. Its origins were Amsterdam in 2010, where Emilie Tabor and Maddie Raedts started it before Anneke Schogt became chief executive in 2016.

Where the work went is Monks. No current network figure exists for the Monks influencer practice, so the 2019 number should not be updated by guesswork.

What IMA was known for

  • A matchmaking platform of its own
  • Fashion, retail, travel and consumer electronics work
  • Amsterdam base until the 2019 merger
  • Full-service influencer campaigns out of Amsterdam

Why it is not a live option

  • The brand no longer exists to hire
  • No current network size is published
  • Every figure on record is dated 2019
  • imagency.com redirects to Monks

Head to head

The two sides of this are not equivalent. IMA is not a supplier you can appoint. MediaMonks, part of S4 Capital, merged with it in August 2019. The record is clear: the old domain now lands on Monks, while monks.com/ima is a 404. Only LTK can take a brief, so the question worth answering is what became of IMA.

By scenario

Which should you actually pick

Forget the pitch decks for a second. Match the partner to the situation you are in.

You are researching IMA

If you came here for IMA, the live answer is Monks.

→ Read the history

You want a leaner discovery tool

No commerce platform, no scoping call. You want 10M+ verified creators across four platforms with a fake-follower check on each. Start free on Flinque and upgrade at $49 only if you keep using it.

→ Pick Flinque

You want verified creators without a platform fee

IMA is not a live option, so it cannot be weighed against LTK on this point. Flinque's free plan lets you find and vet verified creators with no card, then scales at a flat $49 a month.

→ Start with Flinque
A third option

Flinque: verified discovery at a flat price

If both feel like too much retainer and too little control, Flinque does one job and does it well. Find and vet real creators yourself, fast, then run the campaign in-house. No pitch deck, no monthly retainer, no discovery call to learn the price.

  • 10M+ verified creators
  • 4 platforms: IG, YouTube, TikTok, X
  • 200 data points per creator
  • 12 search filters
  • Fake-follower check on every profile
  • Free, $49, $150, published
Watch

See Flinque in action

Short walkthroughs on pricing, discovery and vetting from the Flinque team.

What Are Influencer Networks? Why Most Brands Pick the Wrong Creators

Influencer Discovery Platforms That We Made Easy and Affordable

FAQs

Common questions about LTK and IMA

What is the main difference between LTK and IMA?
The important difference is status. LTK is a live business you can brief. Anyone searching this name should know IMA cannot be engaged today. S4 Capital folded it into MediaMonks in August 2019. Two checks settle it: imagency.com redirects to the Monks influencer marketing page and monks.com/ima returns a 404.
Which is more affordable, LTK or IMA?
LTK, because it is the only one trading. IMA no longer trades under its own name; the 2019 merger put the work inside Monks. A reader who meant IMA should be looking at Monks.
Which should I pick for retail sales?
Only LTK is a real choice here. IMA no longer trades under its own name; the 2019 merger put the work inside Monks. A reader who meant IMA should be looking at Monks.
Does LTK offer self-service?
The first thing to state is that IMA is a name with no business behind it. Two checks settle it: the old domain now lands on Monks, while monks.com/ima is a 404. S4 Capital folded it into MediaMonks in August 2019.
How does each find creators?
The group became Media.Monks in 2021 and Monks in 2024. S4 Capital's announcement named Pernod Ricard, Under Armour, Beiersdorf, Diesel, Microsoft, Heineken, Samsonite and Booking.com. The number is history: IMA does not trade.
What is IMA best for?
The first thing to state is that IMA is not a supplier you can appoint. The record is clear: the old domain now lands on Monks, while monks.com/ima is a 404. S4 Capital folded it into MediaMonks in August 2019.
Who should pick LTK over IMA?
LTK, because it is the only one trading. IMA no longer trades under its own name; the 2019 merger put the work inside Monks. Monks is where the IMA work went.
Is there a software alternative to both?
Flinque. It covers 10M+ verified creators across four platforms with 12 filters and a fake-follower check on every profile, at flat public pricing: Free at $0, Starter at $49 a month and Enterprise at $150. It is a lean discovery and vetting tool rather than a commerce platform or a managed agency.

Find your next 10 creators in the next 10 minutes

Free plan. No credit card. Verified contacts included.

F
Written & reviewed by

Flinque Research TeamView team →

Influencer Marketing Analysts

Our research team specialises in influencer marketing strategy, creator analytics and platform comparisons. Details on this page were verified against agency sites, public reporting and client review platforms in June 2026.