As an expert in influencer marketing, I don’t have access to a comprehensive list of every influencer who has ever visited a specific country such as Israel. However, we can consider the broader implications of this question about influencers, political context, and travel.

1. Influencers and Controversial Locations: Sometimes influencers choose to share content from politically sensitive locations. This can generate online debates and discussions, reflecting different viewpoints among their audience. It’s a subject of risk versus reward that influencers and brands need to weigh before making such decisions.

2. Risk Management: Many influencer marketing platforms, like Flinque, offer risk assessment features that analyze potential controversies related to an influencer’s activities. This could involve examining the political contexts they operate in and whether these align with the brand’s values.

3. Brand Partnership Decisions: Brands also decide who to partner with based on past activities. An influencer seen as controversial might not be the best fit, depending on a brand’s values and target audience.

4. Freedom vs Responsibility: While influencers are free to visit and share content from any location, they also have a responsibility to acknowledge the social, cultural, and political contexts of those places. It’s critical to be informed and use discretion in what they choose to promote.

5. Real-World Implications: In reality, the influencer’s decision to visit and share content from a controversial location like Israel can have implications on their relationship with brands, the perception of followers, and their overall influence. Different platforms offer different tools to help brands and influencers understand these potential consequences.

By keeping these points in mind, brands and influencers can navigate potentially controversial situations more effectively and make informed decisions that align with their objectives.