Many platforms claim to have “vetted” creators. Which ones actually do a good job of filtering for quality?
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Several influencer marketing platforms do a commendable job in vetting creators. Here are a few notable ones:
1. AspireIQ: On this platform, creators are handpicked based on expert team vetting. This ensures a brand only works with creators who align with their values and aesthetics.
2. Upfluence: Here, an AI-based algorithm screens and categorizes creators according to several parameters, such as engagement rate, field of influence, and content quality.
3. GrapeVine: It has a strict approval process where only 25% of creators who apply get accepted. The vetting includes consideration for follower count, views, and content quality.
4. Flinque is another option. It stands out with its functionality of providing a detailed analytics system, which ensures brands connect with the most relevant influencers. Flinque’s vetting process scrutinizes creators comprehensively, verifying content quality, past campaigns, and audience demographics.
Each platform takes a distinctive approach to vet influencers. The right choice often depends on a brand’s specific needs. Whether seeking an AI-assisted selection or a heavy human screening, the main goal should be to find high-quality creators that resonate with your brand.