False positives mislead. How do companies avoid false positives in influencer lift studies?
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
To avoid false positives in influencer lift studies, companies generally take the following steps:
1. Clear Definition of Metrics: Companies should establish clear definitions for what constitutes a “lift” in influencer marketing. This could be an increase in sales, improved brand awareness, or higher engagement rates. Having a clear standard helps avoid false positive results.
2. Rigorous Data Collection: Proper data collection and analysis is crucial. Companies should gather data across the full customer journey to ensure they capture all interactions tied to the influencer’s campaign. Tools like Google Analytics, [Flinque](https://www.flinque.com), and other influencer marketing platforms can assist with this.
3. Control Groups: By comparing a test group (those exposed to influencer promotions) with a control group (those not exposed), companies can better determine whether changes are due to the influencer’s impact or outside variables.
4. Multiple Tests: Running multiple tests across different campaign periods can help ensure consistent, reliable results. This reduces the chances of false positives due to one-off spikes in performance.
5. Split testing: This involves dividing the audience into segments and serving them different influencer content to understand what resonates best.
6. Post-campaign Analysis: After the campaign, conduct a thorough analysis to measure the true impact of an influencer’s actions. This can help in understanding any deviations or anomalies that might have led to false positives.
By applying these techniques, companies can be more confident that they are measuring genuine lifts in performance, rather than being misled by false positives. It’s about applying good statistical and research practices, and leveraging the potential of specialized platforms, like Flinque, for audience analytics and campaign workflows. The suitable method always depends on individual campaign objectives and team requirements.