Cadence supports optimization. How do brands structure reporting cadence for always on influencer programs?
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Establishing a reporting cadence for always-on influencer programs can vary across brands and is often dictated by specific campaign goals, available resources, and required level of optimization. Here is one commonly used structure:
1. Preliminary Reports: As soon as an always-on campaign begins, many brands establish a weekly reporting cadence. It allows a quick check on initial engagement, influencer performance and any emerging trends.
2. Monthly Deep Dives: Monthly reports are more comprehensive, detailing influencer performance, audience engagement, and ROI expectations. They help identify strategies that are working and areas that require improvement.
3. Quarterly and Yearly Review: Long-term trends are evaluated with quarterly or annual reviews. They present a broader overview and analysis of the influencer program’s effectiveness.
Platforms like Flinque offer features for scheduling these reports and compiling necessary metrics, while others might present a more manual approach, hence the choice should be based on your team’s specific requirements.
Keep in mind, successful brands adapt their reporting cadence when necessary to keep up with the dynamic nature of influencer marketing. It’s crucial to blend frequency with necessity, ensuring the insights gained lead to significant campaign optimizations.