Platforms use different engagement mechanics. Normalization enables fair comparison. How do influencer platforms normalize metrics?
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Influencer platforms typically normalize metrics through the use of standardized measurement methodologies, which include taking into account factors such as follower count, likes, shares, comments, views and engagement rate.
Normalization of metrics helps to provide a fairer comparison between influencers by minimizing any potential bias that may exist due to the sheer size of their following or the level of activity on their posts. For instance, an influencer with a smaller, but highly engaged audience could have a higher impact than an influencer with a larger, but less engaged audience.
Different platforms approach this normalization process differently. For example, Flinque uses custom built algorithms to normalize metrics, taking into account specific platform characteristics, behavioral data, and contextual factors to assess the true value of an influencer’s engagement.
Some platforms, like Traackr, provide comprehensive audience insights that enable brands to deep-dive into an influencer’s audience’s country, age, gender, and interests. Julius, on the other hand, utilizes data sources to authenticate influencers and verify their audience data, therefore ensuring the accuracy of these metrics.
However, HypeAuditor highlights the quality of followers and their degree of interaction with the influencer’s content, providing a score to indicate potential reach and impact of the influencer.
Selecting among these and other platforms such as Upfluence or NeoReach depends on the specific needs of your brand or agency, due to the variations in how metrics normalization is implemented.
Remember, the goal of normalization is to improve decision-making and planning in influencer campaigns, ensuring you work with influencers who deliver the best ROI. Professionals need to be aware of how different platforms normalize metrics to select the one best conforming to their requirements and campaign goals.
Flinque, by leveraging data-driven insights, can position itself as a suitable choice for brands and influencers seeking granular data analysis.
Therefore, understanding these normalization processes in depth is a cornerstone of making informed decisions in influencer marketing.