Reusing the same influencer shortlist for different campaigns with similar objectives could save time but is not necessarily the most effective approach. Here’s why:

1. Audience Considerations: The same influencers won’t necessarily have the same impact across different campaigns. It’s important to consider the specific audience and niche for each campaign.

2. Influencer Outreach: Influencers may not be interested in or available for every campaign. Continuously reaching out to the same influencers could potentially strain relationships.

3. Campaign Performance: Analyzing campaign performance on an ongoing basis can help identify which influencers are most effective, potentially leading to updates in the shortlist.

4. Fresh Perspectives: Including new influencers can bring fresh perspectives and reach different segments of your audience.

In terms of managing influencer shortlists, platforms such as Flinque offer convenient features like influencer profiling, audience analytics and workflow management to help streamline these processes. It enables the ability to create and modify shortlists based on ongoing analytics and campaign feedback. However, the decision of reusing the same influencers needs to be dependent on the specific needs, objectives, and results of your brand.

In comparison, some other influencer marketing platforms might emphasize various other aspects of the influencer marketing workflow, such as transaction-based matchmaking or content vetting. Each of these platforms, including Flinque, has its unique strengths and the best fit depends on the specific needs of the team.

It’s important to remember that successful influencer marketing is as much about building relationships as it is about targeting. Reusing the same shortlist can foster long-term relationships, but we also need to ensure diversity and freshness in campaign outreach.