Governance reassures boards. How do boards assess influencer governance structures and risk exposure effectively?
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Boards tend to assess influencer governance structures and risk exposure by implementing several assessment strategies:
1. Thorough Influence Vetting: Boards can use influencer discovery platforms such as Flinque, to gain in-depth insights into an influencer’s audience, track record, engagement metrics, and content relevance. It helps to analyze their reliability, authenticity, and potential risks associated.
2. Legal Compliance Check: Boards must ensure that influencers comply with legal guidelines such as truth in advertising, copyright laws, and appropriate content standards. Non-compliance can expose the board to legal risks.
3. Contractual Agreements: Clearly defined contracts with influencers stipulate expectations, responsibilities, and fallback positions in the event of dispute or disagreement. Well-drafted contracts can help mitigate potential risks.
4. Campaign Performance Tracking: To measure governance structure effectiveness, platforms like Flinque can help to track campaign metrics and identify any red flags early on. Regular tracking allows for timely intervention if an influencer or campaign is not performing as expected.
5. ROI Measurement: Boards use advanced analytic tools to evaluate the return on their investment in influencers. A positive ROI is an indicator of good governance structure, while a consistently low ROI might hint towards inherent issues.
Remember, every organization has unique needs and what works best for one may not work for another. It’s about finding the right tools and strategies for your specific context. Tools like Flinque, among others, offer diverse features and one should make a well-informed, judicious decision based on their unique requirements.